Reign of Justice
Three recent Himachal Pradesh High Court decisions clarify when a retired HRTC employee may receive additional increments, why courts cannot rewrite mandatory recruitment qualifications, and why compassionate appointment cannot be claimed after the immediate financial crisis has passed.
Continue reading “Himachal Law Journal: Increments, Recruitment Rules and Compassionate Appointment”Public-interest litigation relaxes the traditional rules of standing, but it also places an unusually high burden of candour on the person invoking it. In Ajay Bhaik v. State of Himachal Pradesh, the Himachal Pradesh High Court found that this burden had not been met—and forfeited the petitioner’s deposit of ₹2 lakh.
Continue reading “When a PIL Conceals a Private Contest: Himachal High Court’s ₹2 Lakh Warning”In the ever-evolving field of medicine, the pursuit of higher knowledge and specialization is a common aspiration for many medical professionals. However, this pursuit often finds itself at a crossroads with administrative decisions and state requirements. A recent judgment by Sandeep Sharma, J., brings this delicate balance to the forefront, as it delves into a case where a medical professional’s request for a No Objection Certificate (NOC) to pursue a post-doctor fellowship at AIIMS, Jodhpur, was rejected by the state, citing an acute shortage of Radiologists.
Continue reading “Balancing Professional Aspirations and State Requirements: The Recent Judgment on grant of NOC for Medical Fellowships”
LawUmbrella 