Public-interest litigation relaxes the traditional rules of standing, but it also places an unusually high burden of candour on the person invoking it. In Ajay Bhaik v. State of Himachal Pradesh, the Himachal Pradesh High Court found that this burden had not been met—and forfeited the petitioner’s deposit of ₹2 lakh.
Continue reading “When a PIL Conceals a Private Contest: Himachal High Court’s ₹2 Lakh Warning”Tag: #HighCourtJudgment
Retrospective Regularization and Pay Fixation Benefits: A Win for Forest Guards
In a case that highlights the perils of administrative inefficiency and its impact on the fundamental right to equality, the Himachal Pradesh High Court delivered a landmark judgment in favor of Forest Guards who were left behind in the race for regularization. At the heart of the matter was a seemingly small, yet significant delay in regularizing the petitioners’ services—a delay that cost them the financial and professional benefits their counterparts in the Dharamshala Circle enjoyed. The courtroom battle underscored a critical question: should employees suffer because of administrative lapses beyond their control? The court’s answer was a resounding no.
Continue reading “Retrospective Regularization and Pay Fixation Benefits: A Win for Forest Guards”