HP’s Contract Employee Act and Its Constitutional Downfall

In a landmark constitutional ruling delivered on 25 April 2026, a Division Bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed the Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024 (Act No. 23 of 2025) in its entirety. The impugned Act had been enacted to neutralise decades of judicial precedent protecting the service benefits of contract and ad hoc employees appointed dehors Recruitment and Promotion Rules. The Court held the Act unconstitutional on the grounds that it violated the separation of powers, attacked judicial independence, was manifestly arbitrary under Article 14 of the Constitution, violated the constitutional scheme of public employment under Articles 16 and 309, and exceeded the legislative competence of the State Legislature. The judgment is an authoritative restatement of the limits on legislative power to override judicial decisions and carries significant implications for public employment law across the country.

 

Continue reading “HP’s Contract Employee Act and Its Constitutional Downfall”

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cracks Down on CSR Non-Compliance; Directs Action Against Defaulting Companies

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh has taken a stringent view on the ineffective utilization and monitoring of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) funds, particularly in the context of post-disaster rehabilitation in the State. The Court was hearing a suo motu public interest matter concerning compliance with CSR obligations by companies operating in Himachal Pradesh.

Continue reading “Himachal Pradesh High Court Cracks Down on CSR Non-Compliance; Directs Action Against Defaulting Companies”

High Court Cracks Down on Unscientific Desilting at Barot–Shanan Project; Imposes Safeguards to Protect Trout Habitat

Shimla, April 8, 2026

In a significant environmental ruling, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh has issued stringent directions regulating desilting operations at the Shanan Hydroelectric Project in Barot, holding that unscientific discharge of silt into the Uhl River has caused serious ecological damage, including fish mortality and degradation of a nationally important trout habitat.

Continue reading “High Court Cracks Down on Unscientific Desilting at Barot–Shanan Project; Imposes Safeguards to Protect Trout Habitat”

Himachal High Court Intensifies Oversight of Statewide Solid Waste Management in Suleman Case; Pushes Deposit Refund Scheme, Legacy Waste Clearance, and Accountability of Authorities

Shimla, March 18, 2026

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh has continued its close monitoring of solid waste management across the State in the long-pending Suleman vs Union of India & Ors. batch of matters, issuing further directions to ensure effective implementation of waste management systems, financial accountability, clearance of legacy waste dumps, and enforcement of the recently notified Deposit Refund Scheme (DRS), 2025.

The latest order dated 18 March 2026, passed by the Bench headed by the Hon’ble Chief Justice, forms part of a series of continuing directions issued since 2018 to ensure compliance with the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016, Plastic Waste Management Rules and the principle of environmental accountability across Himachal Pradesh.

Continue reading “Himachal High Court Intensifies Oversight of Statewide Solid Waste Management in Suleman Case; Pushes Deposit Refund Scheme, Legacy Waste Clearance, and Accountability of Authorities”

Himachal High Court Pulls Up Authorities Over Parking Chaos, Restricted Roads and Decline of Shimla’s Walking Culture

In an age when cities across the world are rediscovering the joy of walking, Shimla didn’t need reminding. It was built for it. The Mall Road was never just a stretch of tarmac; it was the city’s living room, where the rhythm of footsteps replaced the honk of horns, and strolling with an umbrella and jacket was a way of life. Walking wasn’t an afterthought here, it was the culture.

But the walker’s town is stumbling. What was once a paradise for pedestrians is now tripping over cars that creep into every nook and cranny. Drop-off passes double as overnight parking permits, and even sealed roads are no longer sacred. A town designed for shoes is being hijacked by wheels. And if the sidewalks are choking, the playgrounds are gasping. Grounds that once rang with cricket shots and the laughter of children have been swallowed by rows of parked vehicles. Instead of being the lungs of the town, these spaces are turning into parking lungs for cars. In Shimla today, the choice seems stark: a game of football, or another dozen SUVs. Guess who’s winning?

Continue reading “Himachal High Court Pulls Up Authorities Over Parking Chaos, Restricted Roads and Decline of Shimla’s Walking Culture”

In the Courtroom of Conscience: Reflecting on Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan

In Shimla, there are two things as certain as the hills themselves: the old town hooter that sounds at ten, and Justice Tarlok Chauhan taking his seat at exactly the same hour. Sharp ten. No dithering, no delay, time, like law, had to be honored. For the bar, this daily certainty meant one thing: if you had a matter before Justice Chauhan, you’d better have your file and your wits in order well before the fog lifted from the Mall Road. Once seated, His Lordship moved through the cause list with a rhythm that was nothing short of orchestral. The courtroom would come alive with movement, petitions called, orders passed, arguments sliced clean with surgical clarity. It wasn’t just speed; it was discipline refined into tempo. Lawyers who fancied a leisurely morning found themselves sprinting through their submissions, their watches forever set to “Justice Chauhan Standard Time.” He didn’t simply hear cases; he breezed through them, but never at the cost of fairness or depth. To witness him in court was to witness the law in motion, not sluggish, not ceremonial, but alive, exacting, and infused with purpose.

Continue reading “In the Courtroom of Conscience: Reflecting on Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan”

The Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025: A Threat to Judicial Independence and the Sanctity of the Legal Profession

“The legal profession is not merely an occupation; it is the guardian of justice, the voice of the oppressed, and the first line of defense against tyranny. An independent Bar is the cornerstone of an independent judiciary—compromise it, and you compromise the very foundation of democracy.”

If the Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 had a motto, it would be: “Speak less, comply more, and never question authority.” Wrapped in the language of “reform,” this Bill is less about improving the legal profession and more about taming it. It reads like a playbook for turning fierce, independent advocates into government-approved legal service providers, carefully selected to avoid ruffling any executive feathers. By expanding control over the Bar, criminalizing dissent, and creating a chilling effect on legal activism, the Bill seems designed to ensure that lawyers think twice before taking up cases that challenge the powers that be. In a democracy, advocates are meant to be the watchdogs of justice—but with these amendments, the government appears keen to turn them into obedient house pets, barking only when permitted. The message is clear: fall in line, or risk professional extinction. But history has shown that the legal fraternity does not take kindly to such attempts at subjugation—and the overwhelming resistance to this Bill proves that the fight for an independent Bar is far from over.

Continue reading “The Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025: A Threat to Judicial Independence and the Sanctity of the Legal Profession”

Buy-back policy, HIPA Training, Special Task Force, and other directions by the High Court to Combat Solid Waste Issue

Shimla, August 8, 2024 – The division bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh presided over by J. Tarlok Singh Chauhan and J. Sushil Kukreja, in its ongoing commitment to environmental preservation, has issued a series of significant directives aimed at enhancing solid waste management across the state. Building on its earlier orders on March 23May 9, 2024 and July 18, 2024., the court has now introduced new measures to ensure that these efforts reach the most critical areas and involve every level of society. The court’s new order, dated August 8, 2024, builds on these earlier measures with additional, targeted directives. Let’s dive right in:

Continue reading “Buy-back policy, HIPA Training, Special Task Force, and other directions by the High Court to Combat Solid Waste Issue”

High Court Issues Comprehensive Directives to Tackle Solid/Plastic Waste Issue in Himachal Pradesh

 Shimla, July 24, 2024 – In a landmark ruling on July 18, 2024, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, under the astute guidance of Judges J. Tarlok Singh Chauhan and J. Sushil Kukreja, issued an exhaustive order that promises a greener future. This pivotal decision, following the court’s March 23 and May 9, 2024 Orders, addresses critical aspects of compliance and sets forth robust directives for solid waste management. Lets dive right in:

Continue reading “High Court Issues Comprehensive Directives to Tackle Solid/Plastic Waste Issue in Himachal Pradesh”

State’s Compliance and Waste Management Directives by High Court in Suleman Vs UOI

In a significant decision dated May 9, 2024, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, presided over by Judges J. Tarlok Singh Chauhan and J. Sushil Kukreja, delivered a comprehensive order addressing multiple matters concerning the compliance with the earlier order, examining the Action taken report of Municipal Corporation Shimla, and issuing directions in furtherance of its March 23 Order for solid waste management. This article deals with the above three aspects of the order in three Parts.

Continue reading “State’s Compliance and Waste Management Directives by High Court in Suleman Vs UOI”

State’s Duty to Honor Pension Commitments | Suneet Singh Jaryal Case

In a recent decision, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh adjudicated the case of Suneet Singh Jaryal v. State of Himachal Pradesh, focusing on the denial of pensionary benefits to a retired government employee. The case underscores the legal obligations of state entities to fulfill financial commitments to their employees post-retirement, emphasizing the constitutional rights underpinning timely pension disbursements.

Continue reading “State’s Duty to Honor Pension Commitments | Suneet Singh Jaryal Case”