In a recent decision, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh adjudicated the case of Suneet Singh Jaryal v. State of Himachal Pradesh, focusing on the denial of pensionary benefits to a retired government employee. The case underscores the legal obligations of state entities to fulfill financial commitments to their employees post-retirement, emphasizing the constitutional rights underpinning timely pension disbursements.
Continue reading “State’s Duty to Honor Pension Commitments | Suneet Singh Jaryal Case”Tag: service law
Can Contractual Employees once regularized, be entitled to the same benefits as their regularly employed counterparts? – The case of HRTC employees (2023)
In a pivotal judgment by the Himachal Pradesh High Court in Vikram Singh vs. State, CWPOA No. 2343 of 2020, Justice Bipin Chander Negi tackled the significant issue of regularization of contractual employees in the Himachal Road Transport Corporation (HRTC). This saga began with the HRTC’s inclusion of ‘contractual recruitment’ in 2003, a move that led to the hiring of 153 drivers under fixed-term contracts. The heart of the dispute lay in the inconsistent regularization of these drivers, some after 6 years of service, compared to others regularized merely after a year. The case presents a detailed examination of the equitable treatment of contractual employees in government services, addressing the nuances of employment law.
Continue reading “Can Contractual Employees once regularized, be entitled to the same benefits as their regularly employed counterparts? – The case of HRTC employees (2023)”
