Tag: supreme-court

Straying from the Law to Cage Compassion – Supreme Court’s diktat on street dogs – Part 2

~ lawumbrella ~ Leave a comment

Just when it seemed the Supreme Court had overreached beyond repair with its August stray-dog directions,

https://lawumbrella.org/2025/08/13/straying-from-the-law-to-cage-compassion-supreme-courts-diktat-on-street-dogs-of-national-capital/

the Court returned on 7 November with a new order that appears to walk back the worst excesses, only to quietly introduce an entirely new layer of illegality. Yes, the Court has now “restored” the lawful principle of sterilise–vaccinate–return mandated under the ABC Rules, 2023, implicitly acknowledging that the earlier “zero-release” diktat was untenable. But beneath this veneer of correction lies a fresh wave of judicial law-making: new categories of dogs invented out of thin air (“aggressive dogs”), sweeping bans on dogs in institutions not authorised by any statute, mass-removal directions never contemplated by Parliament, and an expansion of executive-style micromanagement across schools, hospitals, stadiums, highways, bus depots, and railway stations.

Continue reading “Straying from the Law to Cage Compassion – Supreme Court’s diktat on street dogs – Part 2” →

In the Courtroom of Conscience: Reflecting on Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan

~ lawumbrella ~ Leave a comment

In Shimla, there are two things as certain as the hills themselves: the old town hooter that sounds at ten, and Justice Tarlok Chauhan taking his seat at exactly the same hour. Sharp ten. No dithering, no delay, time, like law, had to be honored. For the bar, this daily certainty meant one thing: if you had a matter before Justice Chauhan, you’d better have your file and your wits in order well before the fog lifted from the Mall Road. Once seated, His Lordship moved through the cause list with a rhythm that was nothing short of orchestral. The courtroom would come alive with movement, petitions called, orders passed, arguments sliced clean with surgical clarity. It wasn’t just speed; it was discipline refined into tempo. Lawyers who fancied a leisurely morning found themselves sprinting through their submissions, their watches forever set to “Justice Chauhan Standard Time.” He didn’t simply hear cases; he breezed through them, but never at the cost of fairness or depth. To witness him in court was to witness the law in motion, not sluggish, not ceremonial, but alive, exacting, and infused with purpose.

Continue reading “In the Courtroom of Conscience: Reflecting on Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan” →

The Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025: A Threat to Judicial Independence and the Sanctity of the Legal Profession

~ lawumbrella ~ Leave a comment
“The legal profession is not merely an occupation; it is the guardian of justice, the voice of the oppressed, and the first line of defense against tyranny. An independent Bar is the cornerstone of an independent judiciary—compromise it, and you compromise the very foundation of democracy.”

If the Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025 had a motto, it would be: “Speak less, comply more, and never question authority.” Wrapped in the language of “reform,” this Bill is less about improving the legal profession and more about taming it. It reads like a playbook for turning fierce, independent advocates into government-approved legal service providers, carefully selected to avoid ruffling any executive feathers. By expanding control over the Bar, criminalizing dissent, and creating a chilling effect on legal activism, the Bill seems designed to ensure that lawyers think twice before taking up cases that challenge the powers that be. In a democracy, advocates are meant to be the watchdogs of justice—but with these amendments, the government appears keen to turn them into obedient house pets, barking only when permitted. The message is clear: fall in line, or risk professional extinction. But history has shown that the legal fraternity does not take kindly to such attempts at subjugation—and the overwhelming resistance to this Bill proves that the fight for an independent Bar is far from over.

Continue reading “The Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2025: A Threat to Judicial Independence and the Sanctity of the Legal Profession” →

Inconvienient Judgments that ruffle too many feathers-The case of the silent majority, Judicial Transfers and Sherlock Holmes

~ lawumbrella ~ Leave a comment

Imagine Sherlock Holmes sitting in his Baker Street flat, scratching his head over the enigma of judicial transfers in India. “It’s quite elementary, my dear Watson,” he might say, “except when it’s not. The transfers happen without consent, reasons are shrouded in secrecy, and the silent majority watches as the plot thickens!”

Continue reading “Inconvienient Judgments that ruffle too many feathers-The case of the silent majority, Judicial Transfers and Sherlock Holmes” →