Introduction: The question regarding the ability of a court to mandate the re-evaluation of examination papers in the absence of a specific statutory provision is a matter of great legal significance. The Supreme Court of India has consistently maintained that re-evaluation of examination papers is not a right that candidates can demand unless there is an explicit provision in the relevant rules or statutes. The jurisprudence pertaining to the re-evaluation of answer scripts in India is marked by a strong reluctance to interfere in the absence of statutory provisions. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court has made exceptions in situations where there are clear errors in evaluation or when statutory rights, such as those enshrined in the Right to Information (RTI) Act, are implicated. Together, these judgments underscore the importance of maintaining a balanced approach that respects the autonomy of educational institutions while ensuring fairness and accuracy in the evaluation process.