27 JULY 2020
SUPREME COURT
Installation of CCTV cameras in Police Stations: SC seeks MHA’s update on implementation of its 2017 judgment
[Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh, 2020 SCC Online SC 578, order dated 16-07-2020]
One Nation One Education Board| SC refuses to entertain PIL, says it’s not the function of the Court
[Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India, 2020 SCC Online SC 580, order dated 17-07-2020]
Can a policy framed under Article 161 for grant of remission override the requirements under Section 433-A CrPC? Larger Bench to decide
[Pyare Lal v. State of Haryana, 2020 SCC Online SC 583, order dated 17-07-2020]
Execution of Will| Sufficient to prove attestation of one attesting witness to be in his handwriting when both attesting witnesses are dead
[V. Kalyanaswamy (D) v. L. Bakthavatsalam (D), 2020 SCC Online SC 584, decided on 17-07-2020]
SC issues notice in suo motu contempt petition against advocate Prashant Bhushan and Twitter
[In re Prashant Bhushan, 2020 SCC Online SC 588, order dated 22-07-2020]
Vikas Dubey Encounter| SC gives a go ahead to Inquiry Committee headed by Former SC judge Justice B S Chauhan
[Ghanshyam Upadhyay v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2020 SCC Online SC 587, order dated 22-07-2020]
HIGH COURTS
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Why the U.P. Epidemic Disease COVID-19 Regulations, 2020 is not being implemented properly? People are not bothered of physical distancing norms
[Inhuman Condition at Quarantine Centres and for providing better treatment to Corona Positive v. State of U.P., 2020 SCC Online All 864, decided on 13-07-2020]
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Step-father accused of sexually abusing step-daughter granted bail since investigation in case complete
[Makrand Chandrakant Bapardekar v. State of Maharashtra, 2020 SCC Online Bom 779, decided on 13-07-2020]
State Legislature cannot be directed to include “Advocates” under the category of “Essential Services”
[Imran Mohd. Salar Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra, 2020 SCC Online Bom 787, decided on 10-07-2020]
Govt. Order for payment of full wages during lockdown not applicable where management and workmen were already engaged in industrial adjudication prior to lockdown
[Premier Employees Union v. State of Maharashtra, 2020 SCC Online Bom 794, decided on 13-07-2020]
RBI Circulars granting moratorium on loan repayment does not apply to mutual funds and debentures
[Zee Learn Ltd. v. UTI Asset Management Co. Ltd., 2020 SCC Online Bom 806, decided on 13-07-2020]
Domain name Registrar can’t black list or block list a domain that is registered; No human element involved in overseeing legitimacy of any chosen domain name
[Hindustan Unilever Limited v. Endurance Domains Technology LLP, 2020 SCC Online Bom 809, decided on 12-06-2020]
DELHI HIGH COURT
DU’s notification for remotely holding Open Book Examination challenged on being against the rights of visually impaired students
[National Federation of the Blind v. Union of India, 2020 SCC Online Del 751, decided on 13-07-2020]
Indian Army’s policy of social media ban for its members to be submitted in a sealed cover for perusal of Court
[P.K. Choudhary v. Union of India, 2020 SCC Online Del 755, decided on 14-07-2020]
Del HC directs immediate removal of law student’s photographs lifted from social media platforms and placed on porn website
[X v. Union of India, 2020 SCC Online Del 761, decided on 17-07-2020]
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Right to construct unauthorized temple and that also on a footpath can’t be an essential part of any religion which can be protected under Art. 25
[ Sanathana Kalakshetra v. Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike, 2020 SCC Online Kar 871 , decided on 14-07-2020]
KERALA HIGH COURT
Sessions Judge’s appointment set aside as appointee was not an advocate and was instead in judicial service, as on the date of appointment
[K. Deepa v. State of Kerala, 2020 SCC Online Ker 2769, decided on 14-07-2020]
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Unaided private institutions in T.N. to collect 40% tuition fees as advance fee; Arrears of tuition fees to be paid before 30 Sept 2020
[Arockia Madha Matriculation Higher Secondary School v. Chief secretary to Government, 2020 SCC Online Mad 1442, decided on 17-07-2020]
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Tri HC takes suo motu cognizance on reports of minor girl being pushed into flesh trade outside State; Co-operative efforts of agencies resulted in bringing the girl back to Tripura
[Court on its own motion v. State of Tripura, 2020 SCC Online Tri 301, decided on 17-07-2020]
FOREIGN COURTS
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Louisiana’s Act 620 declared unconstitutional as it imposes a severe burden on women for access to abortion
[June Medical Services v. Stephen Russo, 2020 SCC Online US SC 4, decided on 29-06-2020
18 JULY 2020
SUPREME COURT
Even non-payment of entire sale consideration cannot be a ground cancellation of sale deed
[Dahiben v. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali, 2020 SCC Online SC 562, decided on 09-07-2020]
Migrant Labourers: SC pulls up Maharashtra for lapses; says “this is not an adversarial litigation”
[In re : Problems and Miseries of Migrant Labourers, 2020 SCC Online SC 563, order dated 09-07-2020]
SC clarifies law on admissibility of electronic evidence without certificate under Section 65B of Evidence Act, 1872
[Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal, 2020 SCC Online SC 571, decided on 14-07-2020]
Notice to Centre on petition seeking payment of maternity benefit to all pregnant and lactating women
[Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India, 2020 SCC Online SC 573, order dated 14-07-2020]
SC upholds Travancore royal family’s right in administration of Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple in Kerala
[Sri Marthanda Varma (D) v. State of Kerala, 2020 SCC Online Mad 1332, decided on 13-07-2020]
HIGH COURTS
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Abortion is often the only way out in a very difficult situation for a woman; Medical termination of pregnancy beyond 20 weeks can be permitted only on limited grounds
[Rubina Kasam Phansopkar v. State of Maharashtra, 2020 SCC Online Bom 765, decided on 07-07-2020]
DELHI HIGH COURT
Del HC berates lethargy of DU administration in not issuing degree certificate for “lack of paper”: DU to streamline process of issuing degree with fixed timeline
[Dhritiman Ray v. University of Delhi, 2020 SCC Online Del 735, decided on 07-07-2020]
Remedy regarding service matters for members of All India Services lies only with CAT
[Prabhat Ranjan Deo v. UPSC, 2020 SCC Online Del 738, decided on 13-07-2020]
Schools free to decline Online Education Facility to students whose parents fail to pay tuition fees
[Queen Mary School Northend v. Director of Education, 2020 SCC Online Del 736, decided on 08-07-2020]
Pulling down leggings of child victim and touching of thighs is evident of sexual intent and constitutes an offence of sexual assault under S. 7, POCSO Act
[Rajender v. State, 2020 SCC Online Del 724, decided on 03-07-2020]
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Bail refused on grounds of contraband being of commercial quantity under S. 20 of NDPS Act
[Neelam v. State of Himachal Pradesh, 2020 SCC Online HP 937, decided on 10-07-2020]
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Court directs RBI to monitor implementation of the Circular relating to regulatory package during COVID times
[Velankani Information Systems Ltd. v. Union of India, 2020 SCC Online Kar 835, decided on 08-07-2020]
KERALA HIGH COURT
Rape accused freed as prosecution fails to prove act committed without victim’s consent
[Shaik Shiyavulla v. State of Kerala, 2020 SCC Online Ker 2631, decided on 09-07-2020]
If consent given out of love and passion on a promise of marriage, sexual intercourse is not rape: Court while granting pre-arrest bail to rape accused
[Shanil v. State of Kerala, 2020 SCC Online Ker 2625, decided on 06-07-2020]
Surrender can never be considered as consensual acts of sexual intercourse; Sexual intercourse welcomed could be accepted as “consensual”
[Thankappan P.K. v. State of Kerala, 2020 SCC Online Ker 2587, decided on 29-06-2020]
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Police failed to state how anti-CAA protest by accused was unlawful: Court quashes criminal case against accused booked for anti-CAA protest
[Shamsul Huda Bakavi v. State, 2020 SCC Online Mad 1298, decided on 26-06-2020]
TN Custodial Deaths | Madras HC appeals to print, visual and social media not to misinterpret observations made during hearings & not to conduct media trial
[Registrar (Judicial) v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2020 SCC Online Mad 1332, decided on 9-07-2020]
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Provisions of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 are applicable only against husband and not in-laws
[Rafique Ahmed v. State of M.P., 2020 SCC Online MP 1521, decided on 08-07-2020]
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Provisions of SC/ST Act should extend in its chain of thought process to all foreigners in India, they shouldn’t be called by any derogatory name
[Amarjit Singh v. State of Punjab, 2020 SCC Online P&H 881, decided on 01-07-2020]
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Woman who lived like wife, cannot be deprived of maintenance: Court grants maintenance to woman who lived like wife for 10 yrs
[Sri Bibhuti Ranjan Das v. Gouri Das, 2020 SCC Online Tri 280, decided on 07-07-2020]
TRIBUNALS/COMMISSIONS & REGULATORY BODIES
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Bar Council of Delhi’s dominant purpose is advancement of general public utility: Held entitled for registration under S. 12-AA and consequent exemption under S. 80-G, Income Tax Act
[Bar Council of Delhi v. CIT (Exemption), 2020 SCC Online ITAT 340, decided on 02-07-2020]
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Swiggy has no role in pricing of products on its platform: Unfair pricing complaint rejected
[Prachi Agarwal v. Swiggy, 2020 SCC Online CCI 22, decided on 19-06-2020]
FOREIGN COURTS
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
US SC asks President Trump to release his financial records to NY prosecutors but not to Congress
[Donald J. Trump v. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., No. 19–635 and Trump v. Mazars USA LLP, No. 19–715, 2020 SCC Online US SC 3, decided on 09.07.2020] CASES REPORTED
IN SCC
2020 SCC Vol. 3 (Page 184-End)
Re Ss. 11 and 8, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 excluded/excepted matters i.e. matters excluded from the purview of arbitration agreement and referable to a named person/authority for adjudication, by consent of parties is non-arbitrable.[Mitra Guha Builders (India) Co. v. ONGC, (2020) 3 SCC 222]
Re S. 149 CPC, 1908 power to make up deficiency of court fees should not be permitted to be misused to abuse process of court. [Atma Ram v. Charanjit Singh, (2020) 3 SCC 311]
Re Art. 21, Constitution of India societal interest mandates that law laid down in Mohan Lal, (2018) 17 SCC 627 cannot be allowed to become springboard seeking acquittal irrespective of all other considerations pursuant to investigating and prosecution when law in that regard was unclear. Applying prospective declaration of law, it is deemed that all actions taken contrary to declaration of law, prior to day of declaration are validated. [Varinder Kumar v. State of H.P., (2020) 3 SCC 321]
Re Art. 366(29-A)(d) r/w Arts. 246(4), 286 and 297, Constitution of India qua jurisdiction of State to levy sales tax when vessel/ship/tug involved is used in territorial waters of India, deemed sale takes place at the site where right to use the goods is transferred i.e. it is of no relevance where goods are delivered under the right to transfer to use them. [Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. v. State of Karnataka, (2020) 3 SCC 354]
Re Arts. 19(1)(a) & (2), Constitution of India freedom of speech and expression through medium of internet enjoys constitutional protection under Art. 19(1)(a). Any restriction must be in accordance with Art. 19(2), inclusive of the test of proportionality. [Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India, (2020) 3 SCC 637]
Re determination of cause of incident of fire i.e. whether accidental or caused by insured,, as long as insured is not the person who caused the fire, Insurance Company cannot escape its liability in terms of insurance policy. [Canara Bank v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., (2020) 3 SCC 455]
Re S. 389 CrPC, 1973 Punitive harshness should be minimised and restorative devices to redeem the man, even through community service, meditative drill, etc. should be innovated. [Prahladbhai Jagabhai Patel v. State of Gujarat, (2020) 3 SCC 341]
Re S. 482 CrPC, 1973 to establish dishonest intention at time of entering of contract, it is necessary to implead the company, and to make specific allegations against officer(s) of company against whom proceedings have been filed, to either constitute their direct liability or vicarious liability. [Sushil Sethi v. State of Arunachal Pradesh, (2020) 3 SCC 240]
Re S. 130-A r/w S. 129-B, Customs Act, 1962 calling for a statement from the Tribunal by High Court is not mandatory in every case, where a reference is made.[CCE v. Adani Exports Ltd., (2020) 3 SCC 754]
Re Ss. 13 and 9, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 qua facts that may be considered, framing of substantial question of law on basis of criminal complaint having been filed subsequent to filing of divorce petition by husband on ground of mental cruelty, not proper. [Mangayakarasi v. M. Yuvaraj, (2020) 3 SCC 786]
Re S. 43-B, Income Tax Act, 1961 deduction of MODVAT credit of excise duty that remains unutilised at the end of relevant accounting year, not permissible. Unutilised credit in MODVAT scheme cannot be considered as a sum actually paid by assessee. [Maruti Suzuki (India) Ltd. v. CIT, (2020) 3 SCC 718]
Re S. 27 & Arts. 65 and 64, Limitation Act, 1963 person claiming acquisition of title by adverse possession can file a suit for declaration of title and possession, based on his adverse possession. [Narendra Kumar Tripathi v. Karuna Auddy, (2020) 3 SCC 220]
Re S. 18, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, waiver of pre-deposit condition for filing an appeal before DRAT is not permissible, even when auction-sale is challenged by guarantor and not primary borrower. [Union Bank of India v. Rajat Infrastructure (P) Ltd., (2020) 3 SCC 770]
Resignation cannot be deemed as “voluntary retirement” on completion of qualifying service for purposes of pensionary benefits. [BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. v. Ghanshyam Chand Sharma], (2020) 3 SCC 346]
Re S. 16(c), Specific Relief Act, 1963 not necessary for plaintiff to produce ready money to establish its readiness and willingness to pay the consideration, but mandatory on his part to prove that he had means to generate consideration amount within time-frame contemplated in contract. [C.S. Venkatesh v. A.S.C. Murthy, (2020) 3 SCC 280]
1-18 JULY 2020
SUPREME COURT
You don’t have a right to walk in here as and when you please: SC to Govt seeking condonation of 1697 days’ delay
[State of West Bengal v. Soroj Kumar Mondal, 2020 SCC Online SC 532, order dated 19-06-2020]
Treating ‘loss of love and affection’ as a separate head not justified when compensation for ‘loss of consortium’ already awarded
[United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Satinder Kaur, 2020 SCC Online SC 410, decided on 30-06-2020]
1984 Anti-Sikh riots| No interim bail to COVID-19 positive convict Mahendra Singh Yadav
[Mahendra Singh Yadav v. High Court of Delhi, 2020 SCC Online SC 553, order dated 01-07-2020]
Plea against SC Registry alleging bias in listing matters dismissed with a cost of Rs 100
[Reepak Kansal v. Secretary-General, Supreme Court of India, 2020 SCC Online SC 558, decided on 06-07-2020]
SC extends stay on coercive action against Amish Devgan for remarks on Sufi saint Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti
[Amish Devgan v. Union of India, 2020 SCC Online SC 560, order dated 08-07-2020]
HIGH COURTS
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Void document can’t be sued upon but other legal consequences may follow: Will not enforceable for being void admissible under S. 32(5), Evidence Act
[Bhrigurasan v. D.D.C., 2020 SCC Online All 767, decided on 11-06-2020]
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
“Petitioner was trying to find out which forces were trying to derail lockdown”: Court suspends proceedings in FIR against Arnab Goswami
[Arnab Ranjan Goswami v. State of Maharashtra, 2020 SCC Online Bom 732, decided on 30-06-2020]
Maharashtra Government’s resolution declaring non-increase of fees in educational institutions for Academic Year 2020-21 stayed
[Association of Indian School v. State of Maharashtra, 2020 SCC Online Bom 736, decided on 26-06-2020]
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Harassment by in-laws for woman’s black complexion is cruelty under S. 498-A IPC
[Mazidul Miah v. State of W.B., 2020 SCC Online Cal 1077, decided on 25-06-2020]
Strictly implement the ban on use of Chinese nylon, plastic manjha or thread for kite flying in compliance with notification issued by West Bengal Government
[Karunamoyee Samanta v. State of W.B., 2020 SCC Online Cal 1083, decided on 30-06-2020]
DELHI HIGH COURT
Report of Jail Superintendent, Investigating Officer should be supplied to accused as a general rule: Compliance of order directed forthwith
[Chirag Madan v. UOI, 2020 SCC Online Del 699, decided on 29-06-2020]
Holistic reading of Ss. 306 and 308 CrPC reveals an “inexorable sequence” in which most mandatory step is examination of approver as a witness under S. 306(4)
[Directorate of Enforcement v. Rajiv Saxena, 2020 SCC Online Del 719, decided on 08-06-2020]
S. 14 of Family Courts Act |In a contest between right to privacy and right to fair trial, both of which arise under expansive Art. 21, right to privacy may have to yield to right to fair trial
[Deepti Kapur v. Kunal Julka, 2020 SCC Online Del 672, decided on 30-06-2020]
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Lack of legal awareness amongst children, lends them as offenders in serious matters; Minor boy lent himself in the net of law by taking away minor girl
[Vikramsinh Champaksinh Parmar v. State of Gujarat, 2020 SCC Online Guj 960, decided on 29-06-2020]
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
COVID-19 Lockdown | Procedure to securely release payments to claimants in MV cases, Workmen’s Compensation Act, Matrimonial cases & LA Compensation cases — evolved
[High Court of Karnataka v. State of Karnataka, 2020 SCC Online Kar 762, decided on 24-06-2020]
KERALA HIGH COURT
Citing ‘limited scope of judicial review in scheduling of examinations’, HC declines to put a stay on examinations to be conducted by Kerala University and Kerala Law Academy
[Megha Sarkar v. State of Kerala, 2020 SCC Online Ker 2492, decided on 29-06-2020]
Parents to submit school fees, since no exemption given on account of monthly salary expenditure incurred by school even during lockdown
[Sreelekshmi S. v. State of Kerala, 2020 SCC Online Ker 2494, decided on 30-06-2020]
MADRAS HIGH COURT
TN Custodial Deaths | Madras HC directs preservation of clue materials; Issues directions on premise that case be transferred to CBI
[Registrar (Judicial) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2020 SCC Online Mad 1249, decided on 29-06-2020]
ORISSA HIGH COURT
“Lawmakers have missed opportunity to prescribe stringent punishment; a yawning gap between law and its enforcement”: Court while feeling constrained to grant bail to accused involved in sex trafficking
[Panchanan Padhi v. State of Odisha, 2020 SCC Online Ori 492, decided on 29-06-2020]
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Private un-aided institutions that are not providing online classes during lockdown period are also entitled to collect tuition fees
[Independent Schools’ Association Chandigarh v. State of Punjab, 2020 SCC Online P&H 847, decided on 30-06-2020]
“Accused being treated as adult; possibility of tampering with minor witnesses”: Reasons for which Court rejected bail to accused in Gurugram School Murder case
[Bholu v. State of Haryana, 2020 SCC Online P&H 835, decided on 30-06-2020]
FOREIGN COURTS
SUPREME COURT OF UNITED STATES
In a big win for LGBT workers, US SC holds firing an individual merely for being homosexual or transgender illegal
[Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, 2020 SCC Online US SC 2, decided on 15-06-2020]
CASES REPORTED
IN SCC
2020 SCC Vol. 3 March 14, 2020 Part 1
Re S. 11(6), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, having chosen to consented to new arrangement that there will be no arbitration for settlement of any claims in future, not open to contractor to now take recourse to arbitration process or to resurrect claim which has been resolved in terms of amended agreement, after availing of steep revision of rates being condition precedent. [WAPCOS Ltd. v. Salma Dam Joint Venture, (2020) 3 SCC 169]
Re Art. 226, Constitution of India, importance of visitation rights and contact rights of parent not given child’s custody, explained. Child has human right to have love and affection of both parents. Court must clearly define nature, manner and specifics of visitation and contact rights of such parent. [Yashita Sahu v. State of Rajasthan, (2020) 3 SCC 67]
Re Art. 226, Constitution of India persons disentitling themselves due to their own omission, default or failure to comply with eligibility requirements, not entitled to any relief. [Karnataka State Seeds Development Corpn. Ltd. v. H.L. Kaveri, (2020) 3 SCC 108]
Re Art. 311(2) second proviso cl.(b), Constitution of India in case of failure to record reason(s) for dispensation with inquiry while invoking Art. 311(2) second proviso cl. (b), remand of matter for disposal afresh, with liberty to invoke powers under Art. 311(2) second proviso cl. (b), if required, at appropriate stage and to pass reasoned order after following prescribed procedure, permissible. [Hari Niwas Gupta v. State of Bihar, (2020) 3 SCC 153]
Re Arts. 137 and 145(3), Constitution of India, Court can refer question(s) of law to a larger Bench in a review petition. [Kantaru Rajeevaru (Right to Religion, In re-9 J.) v. Indian Young Lawyers Assn., (2020) 3 SCC 52]
Re Arts. 16 (4) and 16(4-A), Constitution of India qua reservation in appointment or promotion to public posts, neither is there any duty on State to provide such reservation nor is there any fundamental right to claim such reservation, for SC and ST candidates or anyone else. [Mukesh Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand, (2020) 3 SCC 1]
Re S. 300 CrPC, 1973 qua principle of double jeopardy, if the substratum of two proceedings/FIRs is common, mere addition of charge(s) under different/additional sections in subsequent FIR, cannot be considered as different ingredients to justify the latter FIR as being based on different materials, allegations and grounds. [Prem Chand Singh v. State of U.P., (2020) 3 SCC 54]
Re S. 394(2) CrPC, 1973 qua continuance of criminal appeal arising from composite sentence of imprisonment and fine, after death of appellant-accused must be treated as an appeal against sentence of fine and therefore must not abate with regard to that sentence of fine as provided under S. 394(2) CrPC. [Ramesan v. State of Kerala, (2020) 3 SCC 45]
Once termination order is issued and sent out to employee concerned, it must be held to have been communicated to him, no matter when he actually received it. Appellant not entitled to dispute termination order as not real or bona fide merely on ground that he had not received it. [Rajneesh Khajuria v. Wockhardt Ltd., (2020) 3 SCC 86]
Re Ss. 166, 168 and 128 & 194-C, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 qua contributory negligence of victim, the fact that deceased was riding pillion on motorcycle along with driver and another beyond permissible limit, may not, by itself, without anything more, make him guilty of contributory negligence, unless it is established that it contributed either to accident or to impact of accident upon victim. [Mohd. Siddique v. National Insurance Co. Ltd., (2020) 3 SCC 57]
Re Ss. 86, 302 and 304 IPC, 1860 qua drunkenness when a defence or mitigating factor, in cases of voluntary drunkenness, knowledge is to be presumed in same manner as if there was no drunkenness. So far as intention is concerned, it must be gathered from attending general circumstances of the case paying due regard to degree of intoxication. [Paul v. State of Kerala, (2020) 3 SCC 115]
Re S. 27(1)(a), Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 qua jurisdiction of courts, petition under DV Act can be filed in a court where “person aggrieved” permanently or temporarily resides or carries on business or is employed. [Shyamlal Devda v. Parimala, (2020) 3 SCC 14]
Re fixation and revision of pay scale, Article 14 of Constitution cannot be invoked to claim benefit on grounds of parity, if not entitled to such benefit. [P. Singaravelan v. Collector, Tiruppur, (2020) 3 SCC 133]
June 2020
SUPREME COURTS
No coercive action to be taken for one week in representative petition challenging MHA order on payment of full wages during lockdown
[Ficux Pax Private Limited v. Union of India, 2020 SCC Online SC 481, order dated 04-06-2020]
Every consideration received in foreign exchange does not ipso facto fall within the ambit of Section 80-O IT Act
[Ramnath and Co. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, 2020 SCC Online SC 484, decided on 05-06-2020]
Transportation of stranded migrant workers must be completed in next 15 days
[In re, Problems and Miseries of Migrant Labourers, 2020 SCC Online SC 492, order dated 09-06-2020]
Restructure the loan amount and release it to home buyers of Amrapali Group: SC to RBI
[Bikram Chatterjee v. Union of India, 2020 SCC Online SC 494, decided on 10-06-2020]
HIGH COURTS
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Persons, who have completed their quarantine period and have tested negative cannot be further detained in Quarantine Centers against their wishes
[Shaad Anwar v. State of U.P., 2020 SCC Online All 682, decided on 30-05-2020]
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Migrants residing in cramped and unhygienic shelters without essentials till they are updated about application status to board trains/buses| How plight of migrant workers being addressed? State to file report
[Center of Indian Trade Unions v. State of Maharashtra, 2020 SCC Online Bom 679, decided on 29-05-2020]
Maharashtra Government’s Order restricting benefit of fee reimbursement to only those backward class students who have taken admission through CAP, declared arbitrary and discriminatory
[Yash Pramesh Rana v. State of Maharashtra, 2020 SCC Online Bom 678, decided on 29-05-2020]
Flight Operators shall allow passengers to occupy middle seat in strict compliance with DGCA circular
[Deven Yogesh Kanani v. DGCA, 2020 SCC Online Bom 692, decided on 5-06-2020]
DELHI HIGH COURT
Telegram directed to take down channels of its users infringing Dainik Jagran’s copyright and trademark rights
[Jagran Prakashan Limited v. Telegram FZ LLC, 2020 SCC Online Del 615, decided on 29-05-2020]
For a proper streamlined regulation of migrant workmen and their conditions of service, collection of actual data is the foremost significant measure
[Shashank S. Mangal v. Govt. (NCT of Delhi), 2020 SCC Online Del 621, decided on 02-06-2020]
Ministry of Civil Aviation’s order of “fixing minimum fares” is only a stop gap arrangement; PIL challenging Ministry of Civil Aviation order, not tenable
[Veer Vikrant Chauhan v. UOI, 2020 SCC Online Del 627, decided on 04-06-2020]
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
“If State would not have been doing anything, we all would have been dead”: Court berates politicising of COVID-19 situation while at the same time reminding the State of its constitutional obligations
[Suo Motu v. State of Gujarat, 2020 SCC Online Guj 836, decided on 29-05-2020]
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Bail denied on grounds of uploading messages on Facebook promoting disharmony and hatredness, causing hostility to humanity; Urging to spread COVID-19
[Mohammed Mujeeb v. State, 2020 SCC Online Kar 542, decided on 21-05-2020]
Journalists & other media personnel are on the field to disseminate correct information just like police, doctors, nurses & government personnel carrying out essential duties
[Jacob George v. Secy., Department of Information and Broadcasting, 2020 SCC Online Kar 541, decided on 15-05-2020]
No legal basis for Family Courts insisting on personal presence of petitioners at the time of filing cases; Presence of complainant while filing S. 138 NI Act case not necessary
[High Court of Karnataka v. State of Karnataka, 2020 SCC Online Kar 543, decided on 03-06-2020]
No precise legislative definition of what ‘hate speech’ is; Since Parliament has not yet thought it appropriate to legislate on the concept of ‘hate speech’, Court cannot interfere by issuing directions
[Campaign against Hate Speech v. State of Karnataka, 2020 SCC Online Kar 540, decided on 13-05-2020]
Complete absence of transparent & fair policy to choose persons for travel through Shramik Trains from Karnataka; No assurance provided to migrants to avoid unrest amongst them
[Mohammed Arif Jameel v. UOI, 2020 SCC Online Kar 539, decided on 28-05-2020]
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
M.P. Government’s Order prohibiting disclosure of identity of Covid-19 positive patients, upheld
[Nagrik Upbhokta Margdarshak Manch v. State of M.P., 2020 SCC Online MP 1078, decided on 28-05-2020]
A sex worker cannot be considered to be exploiting herself so as to bring her within the ambit of S. 370 IPC for the offence of trafficking
[X v. State of M.P., 2020 SCC Online MP 1079, decided on 20-05-2020]
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Courts should abstain from introducing personal ideas related to social morality
[Sumanpreet Kaur v. State of Punjab, 2020 SCC Online P&H 694, decided on 12-05-2020]
No offence constituted under SC/ST Act where abusive language in the name of caste used over phone call: Criminal proceedings against accused quashed
[Pardeep Kumar v. State of Haryana, 2020 SCC Online P&H 671, decided on 14-05-2020]
TELANGANA HIGH COURT
A disaster can strike State or Nation unannounced: State Govt to evolve a comprehensive policy for migrant workers
[S Jeevan Kumar v. State of Telangana, 2020 SCC Online TS 529, decided on 02-06-2020]
UTTARANCHAL HIGH COURT
Quarantine Centers established at village level are worst of the lot; Gram Sabhas be provided with proper funds
[Sachdanand Dabral v. UOI, 2020 SCC Online Utt 229, order dated 20-05-2020]
TRIBUNALS/COMMISSIONS & REGULATORY BODIES
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL
Vizag Gas Leak | Rs 50 Crores deposited by LG Polymers to be appropriated towards its part liability in restoration of environment and compensation to victims; Erring officers of Andhra authorities need be brought to justice
[Gas Leak at LG Polymers Chemical Plant in Vishakhapatnam, In re, 2020 SCC Online NGT 129, decided on 1-6-2020]
May 2020
SUPREME COURT
Arnab Goswami v. Sonia Gandhi Row| Verdict reserved; Goswami’s interim protection extended till delivery of judgment
[Arnab Ranjan Goswami v. Union of India, 2020 SCC Online SC 450, order dated 11-05-2020]
FIR against Arnab Goswami not to cover offence of defamation (S. 499 IPC); Investigation to continue at NM Joshi Marg Police Station under Mumbai Police
[Arnab Ranjan Goswami v. Union of India, 2020 SCC Online SC 462, decided 19-05-2020]
No contempt action against FCI: To establish ‘civil contempt’, disobedience of order should be wilful, deliberate & with full knowledge of consequences
[Workmen v. Ravuthar Dawood Naseem, 2020 SCC Online SC 461, decided on 19-05-2020]
HIGH COURTS
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
“…No doubts that State of U.P. is leaving no stone unturned in extending medical relief”; Court asks State Govt. to do work in a more organised manner with regard to COVID-19
[Inhuman Condition at Quarantine Centres and for Providing Better Treatment to Corona Positive , In Re. v. State of U.P., 2020 SCC Online All 590, decided on 14-05-2020]
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
“Inhuman act on part of CIDCO”; CIDCO directed to pay gardeners working during COVID-19 pandemic their unpaid earned wages
[Maharashtra Kamgar Sanghatana v. CIDCO, 2020 SCC Online Bom 633, decided on 13-05-2020]
Principle of “No Work, No Pay” cannot be made applicable in such extraordinary circumstances; can’t be insensitive to plight of workers
[Rashtriya Shramik Aghadi v. State of Maharashtra, 2020 SCC Online Bom 634, decided on 12-05-2020]
DELHI HIGH COURT
PIL filed without “any ground work” and any “thought to it”; Court dismisses petition seeking effective measures for sex workers and LGBTQ community during COVID-19
[Anurag Chauhan v. Union of India, 2020 SCC Online Del 584, decided on 11-05-2020]
Keeping a person under unjustified home quarantine has deleterious civil consequences
[Amit Bhargava v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2020 SCC Online Del 583, decided on 11-05-2020]
GNCTD and Centre beseeched to take decision on overcrowding of liquor outlets in NCT of Delhi
[Ambrosia Foundation Society (Regd.) v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, 2020 SCC Online Del 580, decided on 11-05-2020]
Rights of applicant for registration as a plant variety are inchoate & not crystallized till grant of registration
[Sungro Seeds Ltd. v. Dr S.K. Tripathi, 2020 SCC Online Del 591, decided on 15-05-2020]
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
“What is most essential as of now is a more humane approach or touch”; State Authorities should ensure that its citizens do not die of starvation
[Suo motu v. State of Gujarat, 2020 SCC Online Guj 718, decided on 11-05-2020]
MADRAS HIGH COURT
State cannot be mandated to provide free face masks & hand sanitizers through Public Distribution System to people living below poverty line
[R. Dhineshkumar v. State of T.N., 2020 SCC Online Mad 984, decided on 12-05-2020]
“Host State in which migrant workers were working should be made accountable for their safety & well being; States expected to act in unison, rendering assistance to poorer section”
[A.P. Suryaprakasam v. Superintendent of Police, Sangli District; 2020 SCC Online Mad 1004, decided on 15-05-2020]
Plea challenging State Governments order with regard to home isolation, hospital/institutional quarantine in view of COVID-19, dismissed
[India Awake for Transparency v. Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of T.N., 2020 SCC Online Mad 982, decided on 12-05-2020]
Criminal P.C. 1973 – Ss. 482, 216, 173, 200 & 202 – Offence of attacking petitioner by advocates, in courtroom in the presence of presiding officer. Osama Aziz v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2018 All.M.R. (Cri.) 2681 : 2018 (3) Bom.C.R. (Cri.) 115 : 2018 (2) Crimes 392 : 2018 (2) RCR (Criminal) 928 : (2018) 5 SCC 415 : 2018 (2) SCC (Cri) 764 Crl.A. No. 648 of 2018 27-04-2018
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Section 25 (H) – Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957 – Rule 78 – Re-employment on the Post – Distinction between the expression ‘employment’ and ‘regularization of the service” – The expression ‘employment’ signifies a fresh employment to fill the vacancies whereas the expression ‘regularization of the service’ signifies that the employee, who is already in service, his services are regularized as per service regulations.
The regularization of an employee already in service does not give any right to retrenched employee so as to enable him to invoke Section 25 (H) of the ID Act for claiming reemployment in the services. The reason is that by such act the employer do not offer any fresh employment to any person to fill any vacancy in their set up but they simply regularize the services of an employee already in service. Such act does not amount to filling any vacancy. (IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA,CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ,(ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE) AND (INDU MALHOTRA) JJ.January 02,2019,,CIVIL APPEAL No. 7 OF 2019, [Arising out of SLP (C) No. 17975 of 2014])
Penal Code, 1860 – Right to Private Defence – absence of good faith in exercise of right of private defence – causing disproportionate harm and exceeding right to private defence is amply clear. In cases of disproportionate harm leading to death of the aggressor, sentence under Section 304 Part I is the appropriate sentence. Jangir Singh v. State of Punjab, 2018 (15) SCALE 88
Penal Code, 1860 – S.376(2)(g) – Even assuming that the prosecutrix was of easy virtue, she has a right of refuse to submit herself to sexual intercourse to anyone. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) v. Pankaj Chaudhary, AIR 2018 SC 5412 : JT 2018 (11) SC 43 : 2018 (14) Scale 423
Criminal P.C. 1973 – S.300 (1) – When the accused was discharged due to lack of proper sanction, the principles of “double jeopardy” will not apply. State of Mizoram v. C. Sangnghina, AIR 2018 SC 5342 : JT 2018 (10) SC 524 : 2018 (4) KLT 853 : 2018 (14) Scale 442
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Ss. 10, 11A – having regard to the peculiar nature of the respondent’s appointment and rendering of services by him for a very short duration (just 240 days only) and with no evidence as to whether he worked for gains or not after his services came to an end in 1977, this was a fit case where the Labour Court should have awarded lump sum compensation to the respondent instead of directing his reinstatement in service with consequential benefits. Management, Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd. v. Ghanshyam Sharma, AIR 2018 SC 5280 : JT 2018 (10) SC 522 : 2018 (14) Scale 439
Criminal Trial – Conduct of – Guidelines should be followed by trial courts. State of Kerala v. Rasheed, 2018 (4) KLT 783 : 2018 (14) Scale 461
Public Property – While in the case of a non profitoriented educational institution serving the public interest, public property can be allotted to it at a concessional price or for free by imposing stringent conditions for the use of the land, it is questionable whether the same can be done for profitoriented institutions. J.S. Luthra Academy v. State of Jammu and Kashmir, AIR 2018 SC 5367 : JT 2018 (11) SC 271 : 2018 (14) Scale 449
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 – to the extent royalties/compensation payable to the broadcasters under the Copyright Act are regulated in public interest by TRAI under the TRAI Act, the former shall give way to the latter. Star India Private Limited v. Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, 2018 (14) Scale 651
Gold (Control) Act, 1968 – Gold (Control) Repeal Act, 1990 – the statement of objects and reasons makes it clear that over 22 years, the results achieved under the Act have not been encouraging and the desired objectives for which the Act has been introduced have failed. Sushila N. Rungta (d) Thr Lrs. v. Tax Recovery Officer-16(2), 2018 (14) Scale 739
Rent Control & Eviction – Rent Control Act (Rajasthan) – S. 9 – Rent Appellate Tribunal allowed the landlady’s appeal with a casual approach and failed to record any categorical finding on the plea of bona fide need. The High Court had two options: first either to remand the case to the Rent Appellate Tribunal for deciding the appeal afresh on merits in accordance with law and second, to decide the matter itself on merits in accordance with law. Since the High Court heard the matter in its writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution, it was not possible to examine the issue on facts in detail like an Appellate Court. It is for this reason, the High Court ought to have resorted to first option and remanded the case back to the Rent Appellate Tribunal for deciding the appeal afresh on merits in accordance with law. Kalpana Vyas v. Raj Kumar Rangwani, AIR 2018 SC 5282 : JT 2018 (10) SC 519 : 2018 (14) Scale 404
Service Law – Departmental Enquiry – Issue of caste certificate. S. Mahesh v. Chairman Cum Managing Director, Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. Neyveli Tamil Nadu, JT 2018 (10) SC 513 : 2018 (14) Scale 398
Army Law – Appoint the petitioner as Director General Medical Services DGMS (Army). Lt. Gen. Manomoy Ganguly, VSM v. Union of India, JT 2018 (10) SC 574 : 2018 (14) Scale 379
Service Law – Employees did not challenge the order of termination – Not entitled to the reliefs. State of Bihar v. Baliram Singh, JT 2018 (10) SC 556 : 2018 (14) Scale 407
Education Law – Whether a University is bound to give ‘No Objection Certificate’ (NOC) for opening an educational institution or for a new course irrespective of educational needs of the locality under its jurisdiction – Is the University bound to give NOC in a local area irrespective of whether institutions are required in the area and thereby promote the mushroom growth of institutions? Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Registrar v. Sangam Laxmi Bai Vidyapeet, 2018 (14) Scale 575
Medical Education – In view of the deficiencies of faculty and of bed occupancy, the decision not to grant permission for admission in the year 20182019 was appropriate. Medical Council of India v. Chairman, S.R. Educational and Charitable Trust, JT 2018 (11) SC 62 : 2018 (14) Scale 614
Service Law – Compassionate Appointment. Vinod Kumar Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2018 (15) Scale 68
Multimodal Transportation of Goods Act, 1993 – S.26 – Whether the present Bill of Lading is governed by the provisions of the Act or not would not make any difference to the position that an arbitration clause forms part of an agreement between the parties, and would, therefore, be governed by Section 7 of the Arbitration Act. M/s Caravel Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Premier Sea Foods Exim Pvt. Ltd., 2018 (14) Scale 743
Service Law – General Insurance Employees’ Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2004 – General Insurance (Employees) Pension Scheme, 1995 – Pension on voluntary retirement – It is abundantly clear that nothing more would be given than what is stated in the Scheme, and for that matter, nothing less. If the employees avail of the benefit of such a Scheme with their eyes open, they cannot look here and there, under different schemes, to see what other benefits can be achieved by them, by seeking to take advantage of the more beneficial schemes, while simultaneously enjoying the more beneficial aspects of the SVRS-2004 Scheme. National Insurance Special Voluntary Retired / Retired Employees Association v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., AIR 2018 SC 5476 : 2018 (3) JLJ 646 : 2018 (14) Scale 318
Transfer of Property Act 1882 – Gift – Whether a document styled as gift deed but admittedly executed for consideration, part of which has been paid and the balance promised to be paid, can be treated as formal document or instrument of gift – Whether a gift deed reserving the right of the donor to keep possession and right of enjoyment and enforceable after the death of the executant is a gift or a will. S. Sarojini Amma v. Velayudhan Pillai Sreekumar, AIR 2018 SC 5232 : JT 2018 (10) SC 488 : 2018 (14) Scale 339 26-10-2018
Penal Code, 1860 – Ss. 302 r/w. 148 & 149 – there was no evidence to prove that appellant was the author of the gun shot which killed S – the ballistic report (ExC1) did not support the prosecution case inasmuch as it opined that cartridges fired and recovered from the spot could not have been so fired from the rifle belonging to the appellant and the third, the alleged rifle was not taken in police custody immediately after the incident but it was surrendered by the appellant in the Court. In the light of foregoing reasons, the appellant is entitled for benefit of doubt and hence deserves to be acquitted of the charges framed against him. Ramvir v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2018 SC 5339 : JT 2018 (11) SC 284 : 2018 (14) Scale 369
Land Acquisition – the intra court appeal did involve factual and legal issues, which were decided by the Single Judge, therefore, once they were carried in intra court appeal by an aggrieved party and pressed in service while assailing the order of the Single Judge, it was incumbent upon the Division Bench to deal with all the issues urged and record its findings one way or the other on every issue urged keeping in view the legal provisions applicable to the issues. Raghubir Singh v. State of Rajasthan, JT 2018 (10) SC 551 : 2018 (14) Scale 360
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 – S.6 – Custody of her Minor Children – Merely because the father has decided to go ahead in life, and has had a second marriage, it provides no ground whatsoever to deprive him of the custody of the children. Dr. Amit Kumar v. Dr. Sonila, AIR 2018 SC 5312 : 2018 (3) DMC 684 : JT 2018 (11) SC 202 : 2018 (14) Scale 362
Land Acquisition – fixation of compensation – open remand – It will be open to both the parties to adduce evidence and to take all available contentions before the Reference Court. Ali Akbar v. State of Kerala,
Town Planning – Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) Act, 1977 – S.17 – The court can interfere with the revocation of resumption of land only if the executive has not carried out its duty or acted in violation of the procedure. Dalip Singh v. State of Haryana, 2018 (14) Scale 278
Penal Code, 1860 – S.302 – For the offence of murder, minimum sentence is ‘life imprisonment’. For that reason, obviously, the High Court could not have modified the sentence to the one already undergone. Therefore, modification in the aforesaid manner as done by the High Court was clearly erroneous. Jitendra @ Kalla v. State of Govt. of NCT of Delhi, AIR 2018 SC 5253 : JT 2018 (11) SC 355 : 2018 (14) Scale 305
Advocates – Supreme Court Lawyers’ Chambers (Allotment and Occupancy) Rules. Gopal Jha v. Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, JT 2018 (10) SC 492 : 2018 (14) Scale 286
Labour Law – Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 – S. 7A – Kelvin Jute Co. Ltd. Workers Provident Fund v. Krishna Kumar Agarwala, 2018 (14) Scale 373
Service Law – Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) – The punishment of the respondent is substituted to be of “compulsory retirement from service” from that of “removal from service”. Government of India v. V. Shanmugananthan,
Service Law – Retired from service as early as in 1996 – do not find this a fit case for interference. Eastern Coalfields Ltd. v. Bibhas Chandra Bakshi,
Penal Code, 1860 – Ss. 302 & 460 – Evidence relied by the prosecution is full of contradictions – prosecution has failed to provide any independent witness to bring home, the guilt of the accused – there exists reasonable doubt for believing the case laid down by the prosecution and the guilt of the accused has not been proved beyond doubt. State of Rajasthan v.v Madan @ Madaniya,
Partition – Settlement – properties divided in terms of the sketch – the two Wills will stand superseded. This decree will be the source of title to the properties of the respective sharers. The trial court is directed to send a copy of this decree to the Sub-Registrar concerned for the purpose of entry in the official records of the Sub-Registrar. Vasudevan Embranthiri @ Vasudeva Rao (dead) By Lrs. v. Gopalakrishnan (dead) By Lrs.,
Specific Relief – Specific Performance. Harnek Singh v. Hukam Chand, 2018 (14) Scale 737
Constitution of India – Art.142 – Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 – Rr. 115 (21) – No motor vehicle conforming to the emission standard Bharat Stage IV shall be sold or registered in the entire country with effect from 01.04.2020. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, AIR 2018 SC 5194 : 2018 (14) Scale 263
Education – Unrecognized Course – Compensation to the Students – it is not possible to accede to the request of the Deemed University to waive the order of compensation made by the High Court. Nehru Gram Bharati University v. State of U.P., JT 2018 (11) SC 27 : 2018 (14) Scale 239
Criminal P.C. 1973 – S.125 – Unlike matrimonial proceedings where strict proof of marriage is essential, in the proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C., such strict standard of proof is not necessary as it is summary in nature meant to prevent vagrancy. Kamala v. M.R. Mohan Kumar, AIR 2018 SC 5128 : 2018 (3) DMC 694 : JT 2018 (10) SC 409 : 2018 (4) KLT 864 : 2018 (2) OLR 994 : 2018 (14) Scale 257
Evidence Law – Will – Signature – Hand Writing Expert – To challenge the genuineness of the Will inter alia indicates challenge to the genuineness of the signature. Rama Avatar Soni v. Mahanta Laxmidhar Das, AIR 2018 SC 5597 : JT 2018 (11) SC 106 : 2018 (14) Scale 253
Evidence Act, 1872 – S.27 – the facts need not be self probatory and the word “fact” as contemplated in Section 27 of the Evidence Act is not limited to “actual physical material object”. The discovery of fact arises by reason of the fact that the information given by the accused exhibited the knowledge or the mental awareness of the informant as to its existence at a particular place. It includes a discovery of an object, the place from which it is produced and the knowledge of the accused as to its existence. Asar Mohammad v. State of U.P., AIR 2018 5264 : JT 2018 (10) SC 533 : 2018 (14) Scale 343
Army Law – the Court of Inquiry (COI) failed to adhere to the procedure laid down in Army Rule 180; it’s findings are based on the material which could not be relied upon without its formal proof (like the allegations in the complaint or the report of discreet inquiry); and there is a violation of principle of natural justice. We, thus, allow the appeals of the Officer and set aside the impugned judgment of the AFT and also the punishment of ‘Severe Displeasure (Recordable)’. Union of India v. Col. A.D. Nargolkar, 2018 (14) Scale 325
Civil P.C. 1908 – Since the judgment of the Trial Court was affirmed by the First Appellate Court and was further affirmed by the Second Appellate Court, the decree passed by the High Court becomes enforceable in view of the doctrine of merger. Hence, the execution petition filed by the plantiffs/respondents is within time, consequently the appeal fails and stands dismissed. Shanthi v. T.D. Vishwanathan, 2018 (15) Scale 94
Environmental Law – Air Pollution – Firecrackers – Specific Directions are Issued – The crackers with reduced emission (improved crackers) and green crackers only would be permitted to be manufactured and sold. Arjun Gopal v. Union of India, AIR 2018 SC 5731 : JT 2018 (10) SC 381 : 2018 (14) Scale 209
Res Judicata – Applicability of the doctrine between co-defendants – the following four conditions must be satisfied – there must be a conflict of interest between the defendants concerned – it must be necessary to decide the conflict in order to give the reliefs which the plaintiff claims – the question between the defendants must have been finally decided – the codefendants were necessary or proper parties in the former suit. Govindammal (Dead) By Lrs. v. Vaidiyanathan, 2018 (14) Scale 198
Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 – the writ petitioners could exercise their right of occupation qua the University only during their service tenure subject to fulfillment of the requisite terms and conditions and their right of occupation was terminable on their service tenure coming to an end. The day on which their services came to an end, whether due to their tendering the resignation, or on attaining the age of superannuation or for any other reasons, their right to continue in occupation of the flats came to an end. Their possession in the flats became unlawful and unauthorized. They were under contractual and legal obligation to handover vacant and peaceful possession of the flats to their employer i.e. the University so as to enable the University to allot the flats to other employees who were eligible for allotment. Vice Chancellor, Ranchi University v. Jharkhand State Housing Board, AIR 2018 SC 5202 : JT 2018 (11) SC 109 : 2018 (14) Scale 193
Criminal P.C.1973 – Remission – the appellant has so far undergone more than 14 years of jail sentence and he still remains in Jail undergoing his sentence – if that were the case then the State can be directed to consider the appellant’s case for his remission in terms of the relevant provisions of the Cr.P.C. read with Rules – the appellant is eligible for his release by the State in terms of the Rules in accordance with law depending upon a case made out by him. The State can always pass appropriate orders on appellant’s release provided a case to that effect as provided in the Rules is made out. Rajendra Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2018 SC 5127 : JT 2018 (10) SC 431 : 2018 (14) Scale 190
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Ss. 21 & 23 – Flat – Delivery of Possession – Completion Certificate – Full Occupancy Certificate – The Purchaser ought not to be allowed to reap the benefits of own delay in taking possession. Supertech Ltd. v. Rajni Goyal, AIR 2018 SC 5351 : JT 2018 (10) SC 530 : 2018 (14) Scale 187
Company Law – Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, (IBC) 2016 – Section 9 – Insolvency and Bankruptcy (AAA) Rules, 2016 – Rule 6 – National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) – Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) – Application for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process by operational creditor – IBC is not intended to be substitute to a recovery forum – whenever there is existence of real dispute, the IBC provisions cannot be invoked. Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited v. Equipment Conductors and Cables Limited, 2018 (14) Scale 176
Service Law – Promotion – Whether the promotion of respondent No.1 to the ex-cadre post of Executive Engineer, and encadrement thereof subsequently, is illegal? – Whether the delay and laches will come in the way of appellant No.3 in challenging the order of promotion of respondent No.1 – Whether the Government was right in conducting an inquiry when the writ petitions were pending before the Court and whether subsequent demotion of respondent No.1 to the ex-cadre post of Executive Engineer is illegal? Ajit Kr. Bhuyan v. Debajit Das, JT 2018 (11) SC 17 : 2018 (14) Scale 168
Judicial Discipline – It is against judicial propriety to issue orders contrary to the orders of its own coordinate Bench, as the same had attained finality. Judicial discipline mandates respecting of orders of coordinate Benches of the High Court. Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Machhla Devi, AIR 2018 SC 5755 : JT 2018 (11) SC 1 : 2018 (14) Scale 272
Penal Code, 1860 – Ss. 300 Exception 4 & 304 Part I – Sudden fight implies the absence of premeditation. Bhagirath v. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2018 (14) Scale 470 23-10-2018
Rent Law & Eviction – Suit for eviction and recovery of rent – second appeal – validity of the quit notice was not an issue before the High Court nor any question of law was framed on the same – the High Court ought to have examined the substantial questions of law framed by it and answered the same in accordance with law. In such view of the matter the impugned order is not sustainable and the matter has to be remitted back to the High Court. Shrikant v. Narayan Singh (dead) Thr. Lrs.
Election – Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) – Draft Electoral Rolls – Deletion of voters from the voter list without intimation to the political parties – Another writ petition almost identical prayer – Dismissed. Kamal Nath v. Election Commission of India, JT 2018 (11) SC 288 : 2018 (13) Scale 822 Civil P.C. 1908 – S. 21 – Objections to Jurisdiction – The policy underlying Section 21 of CPC is that when the case has been tried by a court on merits and the judgment rendered, it should not be liable to be reversed purely on technical grounds, unless it has resulted in failure of justice. Om Prakash Agarwal v. Vishan Dayal Rajpoot, AIR 2018 SC 5486 : 2018 (14) Scale 116 Largesse – How and in what manner the State should deal with its largesse at the time of its disposal amongst the citizens – Government, is not and should not be as free as an individual in selecting the recipients for its largesse – Whatever its activity, the Government is still the Government and will be subject to restraints, inherein in its position in a democratic society – A democratic Government cannot lay down arbitrary and capricious standards for the choice of persons with whom alone it will deal. Powari Panchsheel Co-op. Hng. Sty. v. Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (MHADA), JT 2018 (10) SC 433 : 2018 (14) Scale 60
Criminal P.C. 1973 – S. 378 (4) – Ownership Flats Act, 1963 (Maharashtra) – Violations of the Provisions of the Act – Metropolitan Magistrate dismissed the Complaint – High Court declined to grant leave to file appeal – Matter remanded to High Court. Dahisar Saraswati Coop. Housing Society Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2018 SC 4805 : 2018 (4) Crimes 121 : JT 2018 (10) SC 14 : 2018 (14) Scale 106
Service Law – Termination Order – Reinstatement – Payment of Back Wages. Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Kalappa M. Sankad, JT 2018 (10) SC 292 : 2018 (14) Scale 103 Criminal P.C. 1973 – S. 378 (3) – Victim can file an appeal in the High Court without seeking leave to appeal. Mallikarjun Kodagali v. State of Karnataka, AIR 2018 SC 5206 : 2018 (4) Crimes 123 : 2018 (4) KLT 682 : 2018 (4) RCR (Criminal) 781 : 2018 (14) Scale 32 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – S. 168 – Whether the amounts received by the deceased by way of provident fund, pension, life insurance policies and similarly, in cash, bank balance, shares, fixed deposits etc., are ‘pecuniary advantages’ received by the heirs on account of death of the deceased and liable to be deducted from the compensation. Sebastiani Lakra v. National Insurance, AIR 2018 SC 5034 : JT 2018 (10) SC 318 : 2018 (14) Scale 20 Judicial Service is very different from other services and the yardstick of suitability that may apply to other services, may not be the same for a judicial service. Mohammed Imran v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2018 SC 4895 : JT 2018 (10) SC 15 : 2018 (14) Scale 28 12-10-2018Tax Law – Section 19(5)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, Act No. 32/2006 and Rule 10(9)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007 are ultra vires of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 256 and 301 of the Constitution of India as also the Central Sales Tax Act and whether Notice dated August 16, 2018 of the Revenue is liable to be quashed? TVS Motor Company Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu, AIR 2018 SC 5624 : 2018 (13) Scale 744 Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (Tamil Nadu) – S. 19 (11) – there is no power conferred on any authority under the Act to dilute the mandatory requirement under Section 19(11). The taxing statute has to be strictly construed. ALD Automotive Pvt. Ltd. v. Commercial Tax Officer Now Upgraded As The Assistant Commissioner (CT), AIR 2018 SC 5235 : 2018 (13) Scale 725
Income Tax Act, 1961 – S. 10(20) – Exemption under – Urban Improvement Trust is not a Municipal Committee within the meaning of Section 10(20) Explanation (iii). Income Tax Officer v. Urban Improvement Trust, AIR 2018 SC 5085 : JT 2018 (10) SC 336 : 2018 (14) Scale 90
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – S. 238A – Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Second Amendment) Act, 2018 – Section 5 of the Limitation Act may be applied to condone the delay in filing application under the Code. B.K. Educational Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Parag Gupta and Associates, AIR 2018 SC 5601 : 2018 (14) Scale 482
Interest – LIBOR is an average interest rate calculated from time to time, based on inputs given by major banks in London as to their interest rates. Vedanta Limited v. Shenzhen Shandong Nuclear Power Construction Company Limited,
Penal Code, 1860 – Ss. 436, 429, 323 & 506 – Set fire to the house – could let loose the cattle, two buffaloes, one she calf and one off-spring of the buffalo sustained burn injuries and subsequently they died – complainant also got burn injuries in the said incident – Since the occurrence was of the year 2000 and taking note of the subsequent development that a compensation of Rs.9,00,000/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs) has been paid to the complainant, the sentence of imprisonment of seven years imposed upon the appellant is reduced to five years. Surender Singh v. State of Haryana, JT 2018 (10) SC 261 : 2018 (4) RCR (Criminal) 780
Service Law – Termination and Recovery of the Benefits – the High Court is not justified in passing such an omnibus order. There is no case for anybody leave alone the writ petitioners that at the time of entry in service, the appellants played any fraud. There was no case that the petitioners therein had played any fraud in obtaining the certificate or employment. In any case the appellants, it is pointed out that, even assuming that they do not belong to Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe, fall either under the most backward or under the backward category, who were also entitled to some reservation at the time of recruitment. Gajanan Marotrao Nimje v. Reserve Bank of India, 2018 (14) Scale 637
Criminal Law – Suspension of Sentence – Grant of Bail – there are cases involving the appellants prior to the incident and the accused are otherwise facing trial in those cases – one of the accused arising out of the same FIR has been released on bail – the appellants should be released on bail during the pendency of the appeals before the High Court. Pinku v. State of Uttar Pradesh, JT 2018 (10) SC 250
Penal Code, 1860 – Ss. 399 & 402 – Arms Act, 1959 – S. 25 – the incident is of 1980, when the appellant was a young boy and that there is no other criminal case against him, we are of the view that the sentence should be limited to the period already undergone. Iqbal v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2018 (4) Crimes 120 : JT 2018 (10) SC 335 : 2018 (15) Scale 243
Penal Code, 1860 – S. 302 – in case the appellants have completed 14 years in jail, including the remission, subject to their jail conduct being satisfactory, they shall be released on bail, subject to such conditions as may be imposed by the trial court, pending a final decision for premature release. Mehboob v. State of Maharashtra, 2018 (4) Crimes 119 : JT 2018 (10) SC 303 : 2018 (14) Scale 476
Penal Code, 1860 – Ss. 302/201 – the circumstance of recovery of the dead body allegedly based on the alleged confessional statement may raise a suspicion against the accused that he might be involved in the incident but mere suspicion itself cannot take itself the evidence of proof. Uppala Bixam @ Bixmaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh,
Limitation Act, 1963 – S. 5 – Delay of 349 days in filing the appeal – Dismissed. Mohd. Sahid v. Raziya Khanam, AIR 2018 SC 4724 : 2018 (14) Scale 162
Criminal P.C. 1973 – Ss. 161 & 162 – Penal Code, 1860 – S. 304 Part II – Evidence Act, 1872 – S. 32 – trial court did not commit any error in convicting the appellant. High Court while deciding the appeal has also analysed the evidence on record and has rightly dismissed the appeal. Pradeep Bisoi @ Ranjit Bisoi v. State of Odisha, AIR 2018 SC 4787 : 2018 (4) Crimes 110 : JT 2018 (10) SC 264 : 2018 (2) OLR 873 : 2018 (13) Scale 769
Criminal Conspiracy – How a case u/s. 120A r/w. 120B IPC is required to be made out by the prosecution with the aid of evidence ? Bilal Hajar @ Abdul Hameed v. State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, AIR 2018 SC 4780 : 2018 (4) Crimes 103 : JT 2018 (10) SC 251 : 2018 (14) Scale 11
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 – S. 58 (c) – To determine the nature of the document whether it is a mortgage by conditional sale or a sale deed with condition for reconveyance, the recitals in the document and the intention of the parties are relevant. Subhash Malhari Muneshwar v. Arvinde Anandrao Kadam, JT 2018 (10) SC 275 : 2018 (15) Scale 98
Service Law – Discontinuation – Caste – Scrutiny – benefits which have been granted as per the judgment cannot be taken away in collateral proceedings. S.G. Barapatre v. Ananta Gajanan Gaiki, JT 2018 (10) SC 316 Penal Code, 1860 – S. 302 – victim is the real brother of the appellant – it is a case of a quarrel between two brothers and having regard to the fact that the appellant has, in any case, spent around 20 years of actual imprisonment, we direct the State to consider and take a decision on the premature release of the appellant. Suganlal v. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2018 (4) Crimes 119 Penal Code, 1860 – S. 302 – victim is the real brother of the appellant – appellant has already served around 11 years in jail – direct the respondent/State, having regard to the peculiar factual circumstances available in this case, to consider the case of the appellant for premature release on completion of total sentence of 14 years including remission, as a special case. Raja v. State of Maharashtra, 2018 (4) Crimes 118 : JT 2018 (11 ) SC 297
Penal Code, 1860 – S.307 – Attempt to murder – Injury was dangerous to life and the patient could have died if he had not been given proper treatment – conviction under Section 307 I.P.C. is justified. Rakesh v. State of Haryana,
Penal Code, 1860 – Ss. 148, 307 / 149 & 302 / 149 – ocular evidence of the two eye witnesses stands fully corroborated by the medical evidence – the accused persons have not challenged the postmortem examination reports of the victims during the cross examination wherein it is clearly stated that, the victims had an unnatural death pursuant to the injuries caused to them by means of weapons such as tangi, sword, lathis etc. – P.W. 3 and 4, were present at the site of occurrence and have expressed awareness about the death of deceased persons – both the Courts below have rightly convicted the accused. Sk. Khabir v. State of West Bengal, 2018 (14) Scale 734
Specific Relief Act, 1963 – S. 14 – Contracts not specifically enforceable – Whether Section 14(3)(c) of the Act is a bar to a suit by a developer for specific performance of a development agreement between himself and the owner of the property. Sushil Kumar Agarwal v. Meenakshi Sadhu, JT 2018 (11) SC 298 : 2018 (4) RCR (Civil) 775 : 2018 (13) Scale 778 09-10-2018
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – the prosecution was under a legal obligation to prove the twin requirements of “demand and acceptance of bribe money by the accused”, the proving of one alone but not the other was not sufficient. Dashrath Singh Chauhan v. Central Bureau of Investigation, AIR 2018 SC 4720 : JT 2018 (10) SC 8 : 2018 (13) Scale 705 09-10-2018
Establishment of New Medical College Regulations, 1999 – Reg. 8(3)(1)(a) – Deficiencies – Fresh Assessment – Oversight Committee – Grant of Sanction – Admissions – Academic Calendar – Fresh Inspection could have been directed for the academic year 2018-19. Medical Council of India v. Lord Buddha Education Society, JT 2018 (10) SC 277 : 2018 (13) Scale 710
Criminal P.C. 1973 – S. 438 – Whether the Trial Court could have granted regular bail solely based on the protection granted by Apex Court – Since the matter is referred to a larger Bench, do not propose to deal with the issue any further. Prakash Chand Meena v. State of Rajasthan, 2018 (4) Crimes 92 : 2018 (14) Scale 236
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 – Ss. 3 & 7 – Penal Code, 1860 – Ss. 420 & 409 – Criminal P.C. 1973 – S. 438 – denial of protection under – direction for deposit – accused who was running a rice mill did not return the required quantity of rice after custom milling – State is permitted to attach all the immovable properties of the accused and the bank accounts so as to cover up the deficit of the deposit. Dwarika Das Rathi v. State of Chhattisgarh, 2018 (4) Crimes 102 : 2018 (14) Scale 237
Civil Law – Injunction – Whether the suit for permanent injunction is maintainable when the defendant disputes the title of the plaintiff? in each and every case where the defendant disputes the title of the plaintiff it is not necessary that in all those cases plaintiff has to seek the relief of declaration. A suit for mere injunction does not lie only when the defendant raises a genuine dispute with regard to title and when he raises a cloud over the title of the plaintiff, then necessarily in those circumstances, plaintiff cannot maintain a suit for bare injunction. Jharkhand State Housing Board v. Anirudh Kumar Sahu, 2018 (15) Scale 34
Inconsistent Pleas – A litigant can take different stands at different times but cannot take contradictory stands in the same case. Suzuki Parasrampuria Suitings Pvt. Ltd. v. The Official Liquidator of Mahendra Petrochemicals Ltd. (In Liquidation), AIR 2018 SC 4769 : JT 2018 (10) SC 3 : 2018 (14) Scale 85 08-10-2018
Mediation – The parties have been disputing on the share of their deceased mother. The dispute was on two Wills. contesting parties have entered into an amicable settlement. Madan Mohan v. Jawahar Lal (dead) Through Lrs.,
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – S.29A – Ineligibility of resolution applicants to submit resolution plans. Arcelormittal India Private Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta, AIR 2018 SC 5646 : 2018 (13) Scale 381
Arbitration – Dispute between Public Undertakings – Since all parties to the appeal are either Public Undertaking or/and the State and its agencies (MHADA), the matter should be amicably settled by the parties concerned sitting across the table rather than to drag the dispute(s) in the Court. Hindustan Antibiotics v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), AIR 2018 SC 4622 : JT 2018 (10) SC 1 : 2018 (14) Scale 1
Penal Code, 1860 – S. 306 – Conviction of father-in-law – the deceased was subjected to harassment at the hands of the accused – Appeal dismissed. Kanailal Sarkar v. State of West Bengal, JT 2018 (10) SC 262 : 2018 (15) Scale 52
Penal Code, 1860 – Ss. 302 r/w. 34 – when preparation was going on to burn Holika and when they were all standing there, juvenile accused was using abusive language – there was heated arguments, scuffle and sudden fight between them – As the occurrence took place in the course of sudden fight between the deceased and the accused party the occurrence would fall under sub-section (4) of Section 300 I.P.C. Sunny Khanna v. State of Chhattisgarh, 2018 (4) Crimes 100 : JT 2018 (10) SC 332 : 2018 (15) Scale 54
Arms Act, 1959 – Ss. 3 & 25(1AA) – Penal Code, 1860 – Ss. 399 r/w, 120B – Licence for acquisition and possession of firearms and ammunition – Manufacture, sale, transfer etc. of the prohibited arms – What is the offence for which the appellant is to be convicted for the possession of the country made pistol loaded with live cartridges and for possession of two other live cartridges. Held, Since the prosecution has not adduced any evidence to substantiate the allegation of manufacture, the conviction of the accused under Section 25(1AA) cannot be sustained – Possession of the country made pistol without licence is punishable under Section 25(1B)(a) of the Arms Act – Conviction of the accused under Section 25(1AA) of the Arms Act is modified to Section 25(1B) (a) and the sentence of imprisonment is modified to the period already undergone. Samir Ahmed Rafiqahmed Ansari v. State of Gujarat, 2018 (4) Crimes 98 : JT 2018 (10 ) SC 594 : 2018 (4) RCR (Criminal) 734
Penal Code, 1860 – Ss. 302, 324, 323, 341, 148 r/w. 149 – the fact of recovery of the clutch wire is not enough to prove the culpability of the accused as, a clutch wire is a commonly available material in the market and there was no specific mark on the recovered clutch wire to associate it with the offence. State of Himachal Pradesh v. Naveen Kumar, 2018 (14) Scale 644
Evidence Law – Confession – If the court is satisfied that if the confession is voluntary, the conviction can be based upon the same. Rule of Prudence does not require that each and every circumstance mentioned in the confession with regard to the participation of the accused must be separately and independently corroborated. Ram Lal v. State of Himachal Pradesh, AIR 2018 SC 4616 : 2018 (4) Crimes 92 : JT 2018 (9) SC 428 : 2018 (4) RCR (Criminal) 470 : 2018 (13) Scale 655 03-10-2018
Judiciary – Andhra Pradesh Reorgnisation Act, 2014 – Bifurcation of lower judiciary by State wise strength of combined State of Andhra Pradesh – All the Judicial Officers belonging to Telangana State having opted and allocated the Telangana State – practically do not find any error in the operation of guidelines finalised by the High Court. Telangana Judges Association v. Union of India, AIR 2018 SC 5510 : 2018 (13) Scale 325
Judicial Service – Inter se seniority dispute between three streams of Punjab Superior Judicial Service, i.e., officers promoted on the basis of meritcumseniority under 50% quota (promotees) – direct recruits under 25% quota (direct recruits) – officers promoted on the basis of limited departmental competitive examination under 25% quota (as it then existed) (out of turn promotees). Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh v. State of Punjab, AIR 2018 SC 5284 : 2018 (13) Scale 350
Tax Law – Validity of the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 enacted by Parliament as well as the Goods and Services Tax Compensation Cess Rules, 2017, the Rules framed by the Central Government in exercise of power under Section 11 of the Goods and Service Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 are under challenge in these cases. Union of India v. Mohit Mineral Pvt. Ltd., AIR 2018 SC 5318 : 2018 (13) Scale 800
Service Law – Departmental Enquiry – the Single Judge was under legal obligation to examine each charge independently and then he should have recorded his findings on all the charges in accordance with law. Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank v. Narendra Kumar Sinha, JT 2018 (9) SC 446 : 2018 (13) Scale 661
Motor Accident Claims – Enhancement of Compensation – appellant shall be entitled to interest @ 9% per annum on the entire amount of compensation granted by the High Court from the date of filing of the claim petition before the Tribunal. Sangeeta v. Krishan Kumar, JT 2018 (11 ) SC 454
Partition – Settlement – directs the Trial Court to dispose of the Suit pending before it, in terms of the Memorandum of Settlement. C. Baby v. C. Kuppusamy, JT 2018 (11) SC 316 03-10-2018
Specific Performance – Relief for specific performance is purely discretionary. Though the plaintiff has alleged that he was ready and willing to perform his part of the contract, the First Appellate Court ought to have examined first whether the plaintiff was able to show his capacity to pay the balance money the First Appellate Court as well as the High Court has not properly appreciated the evidence and the conduct of the parties – First Appellate Court as well as the High Court, was not right in reversing the judgment of the Trial Court and the impugned order cannot be sustained and liable to be set aside. Vijay Kumar v. Om Parkash, AIR 2018 SC 5098 : JT 2018 (10) SC 314 : 2018 (15) Scale 65
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – S.25F – Violation of – Payment of back-wages is not automatic – respondent has been terminated way back in the year 1998. 40% back-wages from 2002 till 2015 for thirteen years would mean huge financial burden upon the Corporation – In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, in lieu of full quit of all claim towards 40% back-wages, the Corporation shall pay to the respondent a lump sum amount of Rs.1,50,000/-. PSEB (Now Punjab State Power Supply Corporation Ltd.) v. Kulwant Singh
Penal Code, 1860 – Injuries inflicted clearly show that the intention of the appellants in inflicting the fatal injury. Upon consideration of the evidence of the eye witnesses and the nature of injuries, the Trial Court as well as the High Court recorded concurrent findings that the accused are liable to the convicted under Section 302 IPC. Pappu @ Hans Raj v. State of Punjab, 2018 (4) Crimes 97 : JT 2018 (10) SC 363
Telegraph Rules – Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal – levy penalty and interest. Union of India v. Tech Mahindra Business Services Ltd. (Formerly Known as Hutchinson Global Services Ltd., 2018 (14) Scale 473
Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 – Ss. 2(1) (f) & 11 – No International commercial arbitration – petition dismissed. Larsen and Toubro Limited Scomi Engineering Bhd v. Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority, 2018 (6) ArbLR 174 : 2018 (14) Scale 151
Medical Negligence – It is not possible for every professional to possess the highest level of expertise or skills in that branch which he practices. Dr. S.K. Jhunjhunwala v. Dhanwanti Kumar, AIR 2018 SC 4625 : 2018 (5) CTC 564 : 2018 (3) JLJ 475 : JT 2018 (9) SC 435 : 2018 (4) RCR (Civil) 625 : 2018 (13) Scale 683 01-10-2018Penal Code, 1860 – S. 302 – Charge of killing his own father – Sentenced to life imprisonment – Conduct of the appellant in absconding till he was arrested, and abstaining during the funeral rites of his father, was completely contrary to normal human conduct, and is therefore considered an additional incriminating factor against the appellant. Basavaraj @ Basavannappa Parmeshwar Bangargir v. State of Maharashtra, JT 2018 (9) SC 427 : 2018 (13) Scale 581
Competition Act, 2002 – the purpose of the Act is not only to illuminate practices having adverse effect on the competition but also to promote and sustain competition in the market. Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Limited v. Union of India, 2018 (13) Scale 493
Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 – Structural and preventive measures – Remedies to minimize, if not extirpate, the impending mob violence – Liability of person causing violence – Responsibility of police officials – Compensation. Kodungallur Film Society v. Union of India, 2018 (13) Scale 607
Criminal P.C. 1973 – Suspension of Sentence pending Appeal – Ground of Parity – High Court declined to suspend the sentence during the pendency of the criminal appeal pending before the High Court – the sentence needs to be suspended in the case of the appellant herein also on the ground of parity. Omprakash @ Manta v. State of Madhya Pradesh, JT 2018 (11) SC 115
High Courts Supreme Court Privy Council Tribunals Commissions Hourly updates from 120+ Main Law Reporters Thousands already using happily http://www.LawFinderLive.com
‘Udta Punjab’ is creative Film has no obscenity Women not portrayed in bad light No ban. Wattan v. Union (Punjab) http://www.LawFinderLive.com Docid 776428
Transgender (Commonly known as Hijras/Eunuchs) do not include Gay, Lesbian or Bisexual (SC) National Legal v. Union http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocId 777453
Just Now ! Data upgraded at http://www.LawFinderLive.com Now has More latest cases, More citations and More head notes from Local and National law reporters
Law Finder now covers 96% Himachal High Court published cases Citations from almost all State & National Law reporters Daily Updates http://www.LawFinderLive.com FREE
Search Engine Upgrade at http://www.LawFinderLive.com Now search “Exact Phrase” in any part of Judgment except Headnote on single click
Application for rejection of plaint under O. 7 R. 11 can be filed even before filing written statement, Roja v. Rayudu (SC) http://www.LawFinderLive.com Doc ID 777406
Biggest collection of Supreme Court judgments reported in any journal any where in India with headnotes& citations No ignorance Now http://www.LawFinderLive.com FREE
Congress Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh dismissed by Centre by imposing President Rule Restored, Nabam v Deputy Speaker (SC) http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocId 778418
BSF Jawan slapped his senior thrice in his office room Dismissal from service wrong – Reinstated, Anil Kumar v Union (Delhi) www.LawFinderLive.com DocId779784
Person forced to undergo imprisonment due to wrong judicial order Judge not liable to pay compensation Sujanapal v State (Ker) http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocId765286
Sentences awarded for several offences to run consecutively except sentences of life imprisonment(SC) Muthuramalingam v State http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocId779467
MOU between Landowner& builder to construct flats and share them Landowner wanted to sell the flats of his share Builder did not complete the work with in stipulated period Lanowner held to be consumer entitled to damages (SC) Bunga v Vasudeva http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocID779990
Marriage alliance broken after Roka ceremony Boy to pay amount spent on ceremony Sujoy v State(SC) http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocID 780376
Petty criminal offences which do not render a person unfit for Govt. job No disqualification, Avtar v. Union (SC) http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocID 780085
False criminal complaint by wife is mental cruelty Husband entitled to divorce, Ashish v. Nilima (P&H) http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocID 781788
Adopted son eligible for compassionate appointment Sukhwinder v. State (P&H) http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocID 780142
Order of dismissal from service can not be passed after retirement of the employee, Sohan Lal v. State (P&H) http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocID 782513
Public Property can’t be alloted rent Free to Ministers for life Can’t be disposed without consideration (SC) Prahari v State http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocId 781470
Employee of Govt Company Sanction for prosecution not required though Co is State under article 12 Warehousing v Bhushan (SC) http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocId774556
Person witnessed murder but did not tell anything to anyone about incident is highly unreliable Baby v Circle Inspector (SC) WWW.LawFinderLive.com DocId 780679
Lathi Charge by Police in excess of requirement State liable to pay compensation 4 lakh to each injured Anita v. Govt (SC) http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocID 784320
If you do not wish to receive Case Alerts from Law Finder please sms THANKS to following number To Include any other number sms City and Mobile No to 7400170789
Custody of minor child given to mother Visitation rights cannot be denied to father in any circumstances. Manoj v Candace (SC) http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocId765784
State has no power to create posts of Chief Parliamentary Secretaries& make appointments Bypassing Art 164(1A) Jagmohan v Union http://www.LawFinderLive.com ID785439
Virus of adjournment has to be controlled Adjournment Applications not to be filed on …. grounds (SC) Gayathri v. Girish http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocId 780867
Voice sample of accused should not contain sentences from the original text recorded in audio tape, Sudhir v. State (SC) http://www.LawFInderLive.com DocId 781041
To stop CaseAlerts sms STOP to 7400170789 To include any other No send No &city If you are happy sms Suggestions To continue receiving alerts ignore the message
Theft Insurance Theft without forcible entry Insurance company not liable Forcible entry is compulsory, Industrial v New (SC) http://www.LawFInderLive.com DocId 785937
Denying of jobs for trivial offence is violation of Constitutional Right of a citizen, Manoj v. Union (Delhi) http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocId 786942
Advocate from outside State can not appear in Court without appointment of Local Advocate Jamshed Ansari v. High (SC) http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocId 786582
A false statement made before ITO during search operations Person is criminally liable Income-tax Officer is a Civil Court (SC) http://www.LawFinderLive.com ID 787577
No maintenance for professionally qualified women under Hindu Marriage Act Sec 24, Rupali v Rajat(Delhi) http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocId 788794
Land Acquisition declared illegal after 10 year Govt to return land without recovering compensation already paid Kedar vState(SC) http://www.LawFinderLive.com Id787338
A candidate obtaining Law degree during whole time employment is not entitled to enrolment as Advocate, Ramu v. Bar (Madras) http://www.LawFinderLive.com DocId 783748
