Imagine undergoing what should be a routine surgical procedure, only to find yourself in a prolonged battle against pain and suffering caused by the very professionals entrusted with your care. This was the harsh reality faced by Jyoti Devi, whose simple appendectomy spiralled into a nightmare of continuous agony and medical mishandling. The Supreme Court of India speaking through Justice Sanjay Karol in Jyoti Devi vs Suket Hospital & Ors. not only provided her long-overdue justice but also reinforced critical principles of medical negligence and consumer protection in India. This case shines a spotlight on the importance of holding healthcare providers accountable and ensuring that victims receive fair and adequate compensation for their suffering. Let’s dive right in!
Continue reading “Consumer Protection, Medical Negligence and Compensation- Supreme Court Verdict”Category: Supreme Court Cases
An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Judgement in the Shimla Development Plan Case
In a landmark decision that has significant implications for urban development, environmental law, and the jurisprudence of legislative powers, the Supreme Court of India delivered a judgment on January 11, 2024, involving the State of Himachal Pradesh. The case centered around the Himachal Pradesh Town & Country Planning Act of 1977 and its application in the Shimla Planning Area, bringing to the forefront complex issues of urban planning, environmental sustainability, and the scope of judicial intervention in legislative matters.
The genesis of the case can be traced back to the establishment of the Shimla Planning Area under the 1977 Act, which set the stage for subsequent development plans in the region. These plans and notifications, however, became a subject of legal scrutiny by the NGT, particularly keeping in view the environmental concerns. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) had previously issued a judgment on November 16, 2017 banning all construction activities in the green and core areas and also within 3 meters of national highways. It also restricted the number of stories to two-and-a-half in other areas where construction was permitted to up to 4 to 5 stories. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has now overturned this Judgment.
Continue reading “An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Judgement in the Shimla Development Plan Case”(to read the critique of the 2017 NGT Judgment please refer to https://himachalwatcher.com/2019/07/31/the-curse-of-ngt-judgment-undoing-of-urban-planning/)


