Category: High Court Case’s

High Court seeks Rigorous Compliance of sanitation issues: Respect for shared spaces and lessons from Japan

~ lawumbrella ~ 1 Comment

The scene portrayed above is from a Japanese movie, Perfect Days (2023), directed by Wim Wenders. The film portrays the life of a Tokyo toilet cleaner, Hirayama, who finds profound meaning and dignity in his seemingly mundane job. The philosophy of Perfect Days emphasizes finding dignity, meaning, and beauty in tasks, like cleaning toilets, reflecting the profound connection between care for shared spaces and human respect. As essential public services, sanitation and toilets embody this philosophy by upholding public health, equality, and dignity for all. Together, they remind us that even the simplest actions in maintaining hygiene can have transformative societal impacts.
The High Court’s various directives in CWPIL 6 of 2017 and the philosophy of Perfect Days converge on a universal truth: dignity resides in the care we show for our shared spaces and responsibilities. Just as Hirayama’s work elevates public toilets to sanctuaries of care, the court’s insistence on accountability and sustainable practices transforms sanitation into a symbol of collective respect and progress.

Continue reading “High Court seeks Rigorous Compliance of sanitation issues: Respect for shared spaces and lessons from Japan” →

Retrospective Regularization and Pay Fixation Benefits: A Win for Forest Guards

~ lawumbrella ~ 1 Comment

In a case that highlights the perils of administrative inefficiency and its impact on the fundamental right to equality, the Himachal Pradesh High Court delivered a landmark judgment in favor of Forest Guards who were left behind in the race for regularization. At the heart of the matter was a seemingly small, yet significant delay in regularizing the petitioners’ services—a delay that cost them the financial and professional benefits their counterparts in the Dharamshala Circle enjoyed. The courtroom battle underscored a critical question: should employees suffer because of administrative lapses beyond their control? The court’s answer was a resounding no.

Continue reading “Retrospective Regularization and Pay Fixation Benefits: A Win for Forest Guards” →

Buy-back policy, HIPA Training, Special Task Force, and other directions by the High Court to Combat Solid Waste Issue

~ lawumbrella ~ 1 Comment

Shimla, August 8, 2024 – The division bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh presided over by J. Tarlok Singh Chauhan and J. Sushil Kukreja, in its ongoing commitment to environmental preservation, has issued a series of significant directives aimed at enhancing solid waste management across the state. Building on its earlier orders on March 23, May 9, 2024 and July 18, 2024., the court has now introduced new measures to ensure that these efforts reach the most critical areas and involve every level of society. The court’s new order, dated August 8, 2024, builds on these earlier measures with additional, targeted directives. Let’s dive right in:

Continue reading “Buy-back policy, HIPA Training, Special Task Force, and other directions by the High Court to Combat Solid Waste Issue” →

High Court Issues Comprehensive Directives to Tackle Solid/Plastic Waste Issue in Himachal Pradesh

~ lawumbrella ~ 2 Comments

 Shimla, July 24, 2024 – In a landmark ruling on July 18, 2024, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, under the astute guidance of Judges J. Tarlok Singh Chauhan and J. Sushil Kukreja, issued an exhaustive order that promises a greener future. This pivotal decision, following the court’s March 23 and May 9, 2024 Orders, addresses critical aspects of compliance and sets forth robust directives for solid waste management. Lets dive right in:

Continue reading “High Court Issues Comprehensive Directives to Tackle Solid/Plastic Waste Issue in Himachal Pradesh” →

Counting of Contract Service for Seniority and Benefits: An Analysis of Taj Mohammad Case

~ lawumbrella ~ Leave a comment

The case of Taj Mohammad vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh, adjudicated by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, marks a significant moment in the interpretation of service rules within the State. The case intricately examines the implications of counting contractual service for seniority and other benefits in government employment, a topic of immense relevance to thousands of public sector employees. The case confirms the vital rights of public sector employees transitioning from contractual to regular appointments. The Court’s decision maintained that the entire service period, including the contractual stage, should count towards seniority and related benefits. The judgment aligns with the principles of fairness and equality set by the Indian Constitution and emphasizes that regularization of employment should retrospectively recognize the entirety of an employee’s service. This case is of substantial significance for its implications on seniority and regularization of contractual employees, in government departments.

Continue reading “Counting of Contract Service for Seniority and Benefits: An Analysis of Taj Mohammad Case” →

State’s Compliance and Waste Management Directives by High Court in Suleman Vs UOI

~ lawumbrella ~ 3 Comments

In a significant decision dated May 9, 2024, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, presided over by Judges J. Tarlok Singh Chauhan and J. Sushil Kukreja, delivered a comprehensive order addressing multiple matters concerning the compliance with the earlier order, examining the Action taken report of Municipal Corporation Shimla, and issuing directions in furtherance of its March 23 Order for solid waste management. This article deals with the above three aspects of the order in three Parts.

Continue reading “State’s Compliance and Waste Management Directives by High Court in Suleman Vs UOI” →

State’s Duty to Honor Pension Commitments | Suneet Singh Jaryal Case

~ lawumbrella ~ 1 Comment

In a recent decision, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh adjudicated the case of Suneet Singh Jaryal v. State of Himachal Pradesh, focusing on the denial of pensionary benefits to a retired government employee. The case underscores the legal obligations of state entities to fulfill financial commitments to their employees post-retirement, emphasizing the constitutional rights underpinning timely pension disbursements.

Continue reading “State’s Duty to Honor Pension Commitments | Suneet Singh Jaryal Case” →

Himachal Pradesh High Court’s Landmark Order: A Beacon for Waste management Stewardship

~ lawumbrella ~ 5 Comments


Shimla, Himachal Pradesh – In a landmark decision that underscores the judiciary’s commitment to environmental sustainability, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh through Hon’ble Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, has issued a comprehensive order, setting a new precedent for waste management and environmental protection in the state. The order, stemming from the case “Suleman vs. Union of India,” encompasses a wide array of directives aimed at enhancing waste management practices, promoting sustainable environmental policies, and ensuring strict compliance with environmental laws.(check earlier directions here https://lawumbrella.org/2023/11/26/high-court-of-himachal-pradesh-orders-stringent-implementation-of-solid-waste-management-laws/)

Continue reading “Himachal Pradesh High Court’s Landmark Order: A Beacon for Waste management Stewardship” →

Non-issuance of NOC and leave to pursue a higher specialization despite qualifying for the NEET exam- The significance of fair, non-arbitrary administrative decisions.

~ lawumbrella ~ Leave a comment

After completing his MBBS from Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Dr. Anupam Sharma joined as a General Duty Officer (GDO) in the Health Department of Himachal Pradesh. He served at various health centers before being selected for a post-graduate course in general surgery at the same college. After completing his postgraduate studies, Dr. Sharma was appointed as a Senior Resident in the Department of General Surgery at Dr. Y.S. Parmar Government Medical College in Nahan.

Dr. Sharma’s aspirations to further his expertise led him to appear for the NEET Super Specialty Examination (M.CH & DNB SS)-2023, which he cleared successfully. To pursue this higher specialization, he required a No Objection Certificate (NOC) and Extra-Ordinary Leave from his current position, as per the protocols set by the Health Department. However, Dr. Sharma faced a roadblock despite applying for the NOC and the leave. The Health Department did not address his request, leading to a significant professional setback. This non-action by the authorities prompted Dr. Sharma to approach the Himachal Pradesh High Court to seek legal redress.

Continue reading “Non-issuance of NOC and leave to pursue a higher specialization despite qualifying for the NEET exam- The significance of fair, non-arbitrary administrative decisions.” →

High Court of Himachal Pradesh Orders Stringent Implementation of Solid Waste Management Laws

~ lawumbrella ~ 2 Comments

Shimla, Himachal Pradesh: In a significant development in the ongoing environmental case of Suleman vs. Union of India 2369 of 2018, the Himachal Pradesh High Court, presided over by Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, has taken a decisive step towards addressing the persistent issue of garbage and solid waste management in the state.

In the latest hearing on November 16, 2023, the court expressed concern over the lack of progress due to the disjointed efforts of various stakeholders. In an unprecedented move, the Chief Secretary to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Prabodh Saxena, was summoned for a personal appearance. Accompanied by other high-ranking officials, Mr. Saxena assured the court of the state’s commitment to developing a clear roadmap for implementing environmental laws.

Continue reading “High Court of Himachal Pradesh Orders Stringent Implementation of Solid Waste Management Laws” →

Examining the Arbitrariness in Public Resource Allocation: A Critical Analysis of the Una Plot Case

~ lawumbrella ~ Leave a comment


In the state of Himachal Pradesh, a legal conundrum caught the judiciary’s attention. At its core, the case of Anil Spatia and Others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh CWP No. 7364 of 2012 revolved around the contentious allocation of a valuable industrial plot in Mehatpur, Una District. Initially designated for a noble public utility—an ESI Dispensary—this plot, number 145, unexpectedly became the center of a commercial lease to a private cement industry. This pivot from public service to private enterprise raised critical questions about fairness, transparency, and adherence to constitutional principles in the allocation of public resources. As the High Court of Himachal Pradesh delved into the intricacies of this case, it wasn’t just about a piece of land; it was a narrative about ensuring justice and equity in the face of potential administrative overreach. The courtroom drama that ensued was not only a legal battle but also a reflection of the enduring struggle to balance public good against private interests.

Continue reading “Examining the Arbitrariness in Public Resource Allocation: A Critical Analysis of the Una Plot Case” →

Can Contractual Employees once regularized, be entitled to the same benefits as their regularly employed counterparts? – The case of HRTC employees (2023)

~ lawumbrella ~ Leave a comment

In a pivotal judgment by the Himachal Pradesh High Court in Vikram Singh vs. State, CWPOA No. 2343 of 2020, Justice Bipin Chander Negi tackled the significant issue of regularization of contractual employees in the Himachal Road Transport Corporation (HRTC). This saga began with the HRTC’s inclusion of ‘contractual recruitment’ in 2003, a move that led to the hiring of 153 drivers under fixed-term contracts. The heart of the dispute lay in the inconsistent regularization of these drivers, some after 6 years of service, compared to others regularized merely after a year. The case presents a detailed examination of the equitable treatment of contractual employees in government services, addressing the nuances of employment law.

Continue reading “Can Contractual Employees once regularized, be entitled to the same benefits as their regularly employed counterparts? – The case of HRTC employees (2023)” →