Nestled amidst the majestic Himalayas, Himachal Pradesh is often hailed as the ‘Abode of Gods.’ Its pristine landscapes, lush forests, and meandering rivers have long been a haven for nature enthusiasts. However, recent environmental challenges, particularly indiscriminate construction activities, improper waste disposal, and consequential disasters, have cast a shadow over this paradise. These pressing concerns not only highlight the immediate vulnerabilities of Himachal but also serve as a microcosm of the broader environmental challenges India faces. As we delve into India’s environmental legal journey, it’s imperative to understand the Himachal disaster as a poignant backdrop, a stark reminder of the delicate balance between development and conservation. This article, while tracing the evolution of environmental jurisprudence in India, underscores the urgency of addressing these challenges, with Himachal’s situation serving as a clarion call for action.
- Evolution of environmental jurisprudence in India
The Indian Constitution, a revered document, was not merely drafted on paper but was forged from the blood, sweat, and relentless struggle of our valiant freedom fighters during India’s independence movement. This charter of rights, which now stands as a beacon of justice in our nation, was born from the profound injustices our ancestors endured. Part 3 of the Constitution, emphasizing rights like life, liberty, equality, and fraternity, marked a transformative shift from British-ruled India to an independent democratic republic. However, it’s intriguing to note that unlike some nations, such as South Africa, our Constitution does not explicitly enshrine the fundamental Right to Environment.
Yet, the latter half of the 20th century witnessed a paradigm shift. The apex court of India, in conjunction with various high courts, began crafting a novel environmental jurisprudence during the 1970s and 1980s. This era saw the introduction of pivotal provisions like Article 48A, emphasizing the state’s commitment to environmental protection, and Article 51A(g), which instilled in every citizen the duty to safeguard our natural habitat. Furthermore, the landmark Maneka Gandhi case expanded the scope of Article 21, transitioning from mere procedural justice to a more substantive interpretation of the right to life, encompassing environmental considerations. This article delves deep into the intricate tapestry of legal cases that have shaped India’s environmental legal landscape.
- The Principle of Accountability:
Justice Krishna Iyer in the case of Municipal Corporation, Ratlam vs. Vardhichand underscored the importance of accountability in governance. The plea of lack of funds cannot be an excuse when the fundamental rights of citizens are at stake. The case emphasizes that those in power, whether elected representatives or office bearers, must face penalties if they violate constitutional and statutory directives.
- The Bhopal Tragedy: A Wake-Up Call
The Bhopal disaster stands as a grim reminder of the consequences of negligence and substandard safety measures. The escape of methyl isocyanate gas from a plant owned by Union Carbide Corporation led to one of the world’s worst industrial disasters. The aftermath of this tragedy saw the enactment of the Environment Protection Act, 1986. This act, rooted in Article 253 of the Constitution, was a response to ensure that such a catastrophe does not recur.
- The Doctrine of Strict Liability and Absolute Liability:
The case of Rylands v. Fletcher was a leading decision by the House of Lords that introduced the doctrine of strict liability. The principle asserts that a person who brings onto his land and collects and keeps anything likely to do mischief if it escapes is liable for all the damage, which is the natural consequence of its escape. This doctrine has been pivotal in shaping environmental litigation, ensuring that industries and individuals are held accountable for any harm they cause to the environment.
In the realm of legal jurisprudence, the notion of strict liability was deemed insufficient to ensure accountability. It was under the astute guidance of Justice Bhagwati that this principle underwent evolution in India. The landmark case of M.C. Mehta and Anr. Etc. vs. Union of India and Ors, commonly referred to as the Oleum Leakage Case, heralded the introduction of the more encompassing doctrine of absolute liability. The Supreme Court held that industries engaged in hazardous activities owe an absolute and non-delegable duty to the community. Any harm caused, irrespective of the precautions taken, would make the industry absolutely liable. The principle was further reinforced in Charan Lal Sahu Vs. Union of India, where the defendant’s plea of having taken reasonable care was rejected
- Sustainable Development: A Balance Between Growth and Conservation
The concept of sustainable development was introduced by Justices PN Bhagwati and Ranganath Mishra in the case of Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra, Dehradun vs. State of Uttar Pradesh. The principle emphasizes that development should meet the needs of the present without compromising the abilities of future generations. This concept has since become a benchmark for all development projects.
- The Environment Protection Act, 1986: An Umbrella Act
Post the Bhopal tragedy, the Environment Protection Act was enacted to safeguard the environment and prevent future hazards. It serves as an umbrella act, coordinating various other laws like the Water Act, the Air Act, and Solid Waste Regulations. The acts underscores the importance of a harmonious relationship between development and environmental protection.
- Widening the Scope of Article 21: Right to a Clean Environment
Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. Over the years, the scope of this article has been expanded to include the right to a clean and healthy environment. This expansion has been instrumental in ensuring that environmental concerns are given paramount importance in the legal framework.
- The “Polluter Pays Principle”:
Justice Jeevan Reddy, in the case of Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action vs. Union of India, held that the financial costs of preventing or remedying damage caused by pollution should lie with the polluters. This principle ensures that those responsible for environmental degradation bear the cost of remediation.
- The Doctrine of Public Trust:
The case “M.C. Mehta vs. Kamal Nath and Ors. (1996)” highlighted the Doctrine of Public Trust. The government’s leasing of protected forest areas for commercial purposes in the floodplains of the Beas River in Himachal Pradesh was deemed a violation of this doctrine, emphasizing the state’s responsibility to preserve natural resources.The land was ordered to be reverted back to the State, and a penalty was imposed on the violators.
- The Balance Between Development and Conservation:
Cases like Kusum Bali vs State and Him Privesh Environment Protection Society vs M/s Jai Parkash Associates highlight the challenges of balancing development with environmental conservation. The legal framework has evolved to ensure that development does not come at the cost of the environment.”Kusum Bali vs State CWPIL 13 of 2021” brings to light the issues of land encroachment and its environmental repercussions. Indiscriminate constructions, especially in ecologically sensitive areas of Himachal, can lead to irreversible environmental damage. The judiciary’s intervention in such cases emphasizes the need for stringent land-use policies and their strict enforcement.
Him Privesh Environment Protection Society vs M/s Jai Parkash Associates case brought to the forefront the consequences of flouting environmental regulations and obtaining ‘EIA clearance’ on a false pretext for commercial gains by a thermal/cement plant. The High Court decided to quash the environmental clearance, order the demolition of the plant, and impose a hefty penalty of 100 crore.
- Himachal Disaster – The Himachal Paradigm and the Path Forward
Improper slope cutting and indiscriminate dumping of debris into the Beas and Sutlej rivers during road expansion projects, as well as the thoughtless disposal of construction materials in surrounding areas, have grave consequences. These actions weaken the affected areas, disrupt water flow, and pose a significant environmental risk.
Additionally, the unauthorized construction of structures that obstruct streams or nullahs compromises the integrity of the surrounding areas. Addressing these concerns promptly and taking the necessary measures to mitigate the adverse effects is crucial. Moreover, the impact of blasting activities carried out during the construction of hydropower and mining projects cannot be overlooked. Such activities weaken vast stretches of land and warrant urgent attention to prevent further damage.
The accountability of officers and professionals involved in decision-making and oversight is a linchpin in pursuing sustainable development and environmental protection. The urgency of addressing these issues is manifest, and the responsibility of these individuals to rectify their past mistakes and ensure a more secure environmental future is both a moral and legal obligation.
Recommendations
1. The Himachal disaster highlights the urgent need for concerted action in environmental management and legal enforcement. By learning from past incidents and reinforcing the legal and regulatory framework, Himachal Pradesh, and by extension India, can better safeguard its environment against future calamities, ensuring a sustainable future for all.
- Enforcing Accountability and Compliance:
Stricter Penalties for Violations: Implement stringent penalties for individuals, corporations, or government bodies violating environmental laws.
No Excuse for Lack of Funds: Ensure that government bodies cannot use the lack of funds as an excuse for non-compliance with environmental regulations. - Adopting and Implementing Strict and Absolute Liability Doctrines:
Application in Industry: Ensure industries engaged in potentially hazardous activities are held to strict and absolute liability standards for any environmental harm, regardless of precautions taken.
Regular Audits and Inspections: Conduct regular audits and inspections of industries to ensure compliance with environmental standards. - Promoting Sustainable Development:
Balance Development with Conservation: Develop policies that balance economic growth with environmental conservation.
Incorporate Sustainable Practices: Mandate sustainable practices in all developmental projects, especially in ecologically sensitive areas. - Robust Implementation of Environmental Laws:
Effective Implementation of the Environment Protection Act: Ensure the comprehensive application of the Environment Protection Act and related laws like the Water and Air Acts.
Harmonization of Laws and Policies: Harmonize various environmental laws to create a cohesive framework for environmental protection. - Expanding the Scope of Article 21:
Right to a Clean Environment: Advocate for judicial decisions that further expand Article 21 to include the right to a clean environment as a fundamental human right. - Implementing the “Polluter Pays” Principle:
Financial Responsibility for Polluters: Ensure that polluters bear the cost of preventing and remedying environmental damage. - Upholding the Doctrine of Public Trust:
Government Responsibility: Reinforce the government’s duty to protect and preserve natural resources for public use and enjoyment. - Addressing Specific Challenges in Himachal Pradesh:
Regulation of Construction Activities: Implement strict regulations on slope cutting, debris dumping, and construction material disposal, especially in sensitive areas like river banks.
Monitoring Hydropower and Mining Projects: Strictly regulate and monitor blasting activities and other construction processes in hydropower and mining projects to minimize environmental impact. - Enhancing Disaster Management:
Risk Assessment and Management: Conduct regular environmental risk assessments and develop comprehensive disaster management plans.
Community Involvement and Awareness: Engage local communities in disaster management processes and raise awareness about environmental conservation. - Improving Oversight and Intervention:
Proactive Regulatory Bodies: Establish proactive regulatory bodies for environmental protection with powers to intervene and enforce compliance.
Capacity Building: Enhance the capacity of environmental regulatory bodies through training, resources, and technology.
Conclusion:
The Himachal disaster serves as a poignant reminder of the intricate balance between development and environmental conservation. The repercussions of unchecked construction, improper disposal practices, and overarching negligence in Himachal Pradesh are not isolated incidents but rather symptomatic of broader systemic challenges. As we reflect on India’s rich environmental legal tapestry, it becomes evident that laws and doctrines, while foundational, are only as effective as their implementation on the ground. The Himachal episode underscores the urgent need for rigorous oversight, proactive intervention, and a collective commitment to sustainable practices. It is imperative that we learn from such events, hold those responsible accountable, and, more importantly, institute preventive measures to avert future calamities. As we move forward, the Himachal disaster should not just be a chapter in our environmental annals but a catalyst for introspection, action, and a renewed pledge to harmonize our developmental aspirations.
—————————————————
Deven Khanna,
Advocate,
Direct (M): + 91 – 7018469792
Office: +91 – 0177 – 2674760
LawUmbrella 